Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Coroc" data-source="post: 7796306" data-attributes="member: 6895991">Well my hope is they rather do not touch it. It has last been seeing official use in 3e, and not much back there.Most of the younger players have heard of it but other than eventually temple of the elemental evil 20 years ago and refeatured in DDO (They also did put in slave lords) it has not been featured in any recent product.It simply would not make much sense and as i pointed out before:The rules might be simply vanilla, and nothing new required rulewise butthe fluff of the setting the tone and the feel is out of date, it does not appeal to many of todays generations roleplayers. They do not want limitations, political incorrect puns, and are rather into worlds like Eberron or maybe Ravnica than into Greyhawk which most of them would see as a blander version of FR if an official product would try to shoehorn all modernisms into that settings.For you grognards (i am a grognard too): Why aren't you much more interested in official rules on how to do Darksun with 5e or planescape or Dragonlance? And i do not mean new content, which is really not needed, I absolutely mean the RULESHow shall i do Halfgiants or thrikreen in a balanced realistic way (Bound accuracy!)? How shall i do dragonlances in 5e?How about minor quality equipment? How do i do the high magic partially needed in Planescape right?What is unclear about how to do Greyhawk in 5e? Nothing! absolutely nothing! We do not need anything for Greyhawk 5e it is all out there and afaik in available in .pdf reprint if soemone needs the stories.If you consider yourself able to DM a Greyhawk campaign then you absolutely should be able to convert the existing material to 5e because that is the easier part of the modification of official greyhawk material you are gona need to do to make things playable and smooth!</blockquote>

Verification