Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Dire Bare" data-source="post: 9477196" data-attributes="member: 18182">It's reasonable for WotC to determine the pace of their release schedule taking into mind profitability. If WotC is not profitable, they go out of business and D&amp;D goes moribund. Maybe it gets sold to a company who does things the way you'd prefer, maybe not.I miss the old TSR days with the firehose of content . . . but it was not sustainable and was a huge part of why TSR no longer exists. And I couldn't personally keep up with it all anyways.Has WotC every surveyed fans asking about their preferences on this? Probably, but I don't think they've shared the data. Obviously some fans would like more products, some fans less, some fans are happy with the current pace.The current slower pace has been a part of WotC's success with D&amp;D 5E. It has allowed me to easily keep pace with the releases. I'm happy and would be disappointed if WotC started cranking out content like TSR used to.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Dire Bare, post: 9477196, member: 18182"] It's reasonable for WotC to determine the pace of their release schedule taking into mind profitability. If WotC is not profitable, they go out of business and D&D goes moribund. Maybe it gets sold to a company who does things the way you'd prefer, maybe not. I miss the old TSR days with the firehose of content . . . but it was not sustainable and was a huge part of why TSR no longer exists. And I couldn't personally keep up with it all anyways. Has WotC every surveyed fans asking about their preferences on this? Probably, but I don't think they've shared the data. Obviously some fans would like more products, some fans less, some fans are happy with the current pace. The current slower pace has been a part of WotC's success with D&D 5E. It has allowed me to easily keep pace with the releases. I'm happy and would be disappointed if WotC started cranking out content like TSR used to. [/QUOTE]

Verification