Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Wulf Ratbane" data-source="post: 1988219" data-attributes="member: 94">I wouldn't allow it myself, but as a rough estimate? +0.2 per wouldn't be bad. That's as much as 2 points of ability score would cost you, notice-- so 0.2 is, in fact, an &quot;overcharge&quot;-- though as is usually the case where PCs are concerned, cost is in the eye of the beholder. Most spellcasters will gladly give up 2 points of Con for +2 points of spellcasting attribute, for example.But again-- there's hardly much point in having a low-magic ruleset if you're going to immediately start finding ways to break the rules. All you'll do is ensure that all your PC spellcasters will be elves.As to what mind created it, that would be Upper_Krust. You can find him in the House Rules forum, usually. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />Wulf</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Wulf Ratbane, post: 1988219, member: 94"] I wouldn't allow it myself, but as a rough estimate? +0.2 per wouldn't be bad. That's as much as 2 points of ability score would cost you, notice-- so 0.2 is, in fact, an "overcharge"-- though as is usually the case where PCs are concerned, cost is in the eye of the beholder. Most spellcasters will gladly give up 2 points of Con for +2 points of spellcasting attribute, for example. But again-- there's hardly much point in having a low-magic ruleset if you're going to immediately start finding ways to break the rules. All you'll do is ensure that all your PC spellcasters will be elves. As to what mind created it, that would be Upper_Krust. You can find him in the House Rules forum, usually. ;) Wulf [/QUOTE]

Verification