Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mac Callum" data-source="post: 1988787" data-attributes="member: 17035">Hmm, good point.&nbsp; That would put elves at CR +0.144, as I count it.&nbsp; Better than humans, but still below the dwarf's CR +0.21.&nbsp; Thanks.One, I was thinking that given the GT spellcasting mechanic the -2 Con was is a bigger problem than in regular D&amp;D, and would discourage taking elves as spellcasters (Thought small race adepts are also disadvantaged, since they have a lower strength).&nbsp; This was an attempt at seeking &quot;balance&quot;, although I admit it could go overboard.Two, that's kind of the point.&nbsp; In trying to encourage a more mythological campaign, I want the elves to be more comfortable with magic than the mortal races of men and dwarves.&nbsp; They're able to more safely tap into these fey powers which can kill the unwary.That kind of thing.Anyway, thanks for the feedback.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mac Callum, post: 1988787, member: 17035"] Hmm, good point. That would put elves at CR +0.144, as I count it. Better than humans, but still below the dwarf's CR +0.21. Thanks. One, I was thinking that given the GT spellcasting mechanic the -2 Con was is a bigger problem than in regular D&D, and would discourage taking elves as spellcasters (Thought small race adepts are also disadvantaged, since they have a lower strength). This was an attempt at seeking "balance", although I admit it could go overboard. Two, that's kind of the point. In trying to encourage a more mythological campaign, I want the elves to be more comfortable with magic than the mortal races of men and dwarves. They're able to more safely tap into these fey powers which can kill the unwary. That kind of thing. Anyway, thanks for the feedback. [/QUOTE]

Verification