Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[Grim Tales] Using GT for sci-fi?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wulf Ratbane" data-source="post: 2786873" data-attributes="member: 94"><p>You don't-- <em>and here's why I think you don't.</em></p><p></p><p>I hate to say it but... (gulp) think in terms of the real world.</p><p></p><p>A weapon in the real world is a tool with several really simple design considerations. </p><p></p><p>Its purpose is to incapacitate the enemy, and it needs to do this as efficiently as possible.</p><p></p><p>Any energy spent over and above its intended purpose is an unnecessary inefficiency.</p><p></p><p>We're not necessarily just talking in terms of energy or resource expenditure with regards to the weapon and its ammunition (if any). You also have to consider things like its portability, its delivery systems, and its cost.</p><p></p><p>All of these things contribute to the "evolution" of weapons in such a way that they will always find the most efficient design.</p><p></p><p>Clearly, it's possible to build an advanced, futuristic weapon that does 4d6 damage. The problem is that 4d6 damage is "too much" with respect to the neutralization of human opponents. 2d6 works just as well. (Don't make me veer off into a discussion of hit points and what they represent-- accept it as truth that a 2d6 weapon is deemed sufficiently "deadly.")</p><p></p><p></p><p>So if Company A makes a weapon that does 4d6 damage, and Company B makes the exact same weapon that deals 2d6 damage in a more efficient way (less gunpowder in the ammo, lesser drain on the omega-zorper batteries, whatever) then the design that wins out will be the 2d6 version. <strong>It's as deadly as it needs to be.</strong></p><p></p><p>And, of course, you always contend with Physics. The energy you get out of a weapon cannot be greater than the energy you put into it. Conserving this energy isn't important only to the weapons manufacturers of the day, <em>its an imperative to the universal laws of physics.</em></p><p></p><p>Now, obviously, bigger, more bad-ass weapons exist for specialized purposes. You <em>could</em>, of course, choose to wade into every firefight with an RPG instead of a 9mm. But again, the point is that the 9mm is the more efficient design for killing human opponents, so that will be the weapon that is most likely to see widespread use.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wulf Ratbane, post: 2786873, member: 94"] You don't-- [i]and here's why I think you don't.[/i] I hate to say it but... (gulp) think in terms of the real world. A weapon in the real world is a tool with several really simple design considerations. Its purpose is to incapacitate the enemy, and it needs to do this as efficiently as possible. Any energy spent over and above its intended purpose is an unnecessary inefficiency. We're not necessarily just talking in terms of energy or resource expenditure with regards to the weapon and its ammunition (if any). You also have to consider things like its portability, its delivery systems, and its cost. All of these things contribute to the "evolution" of weapons in such a way that they will always find the most efficient design. Clearly, it's possible to build an advanced, futuristic weapon that does 4d6 damage. The problem is that 4d6 damage is "too much" with respect to the neutralization of human opponents. 2d6 works just as well. (Don't make me veer off into a discussion of hit points and what they represent-- accept it as truth that a 2d6 weapon is deemed sufficiently "deadly.") So if Company A makes a weapon that does 4d6 damage, and Company B makes the exact same weapon that deals 2d6 damage in a more efficient way (less gunpowder in the ammo, lesser drain on the omega-zorper batteries, whatever) then the design that wins out will be the 2d6 version. [b]It's as deadly as it needs to be.[/b] And, of course, you always contend with Physics. The energy you get out of a weapon cannot be greater than the energy you put into it. Conserving this energy isn't important only to the weapons manufacturers of the day, [i]its an imperative to the universal laws of physics.[/i] Now, obviously, bigger, more bad-ass weapons exist for specialized purposes. You [i]could[/i], of course, choose to wade into every firefight with an RPG instead of a 9mm. But again, the point is that the 9mm is the more efficient design for killing human opponents, so that will be the weapon that is most likely to see widespread use. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[Grim Tales] Using GT for sci-fi?
Top