Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Grognard good...grognard bad
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rogueattorney" data-source="post: 5224006" data-attributes="member: 17551"><p>Why do I have to try out 4e or anything else? If I'm perfectly happy doing what I'm doing, why do I have to try to new thing before continuing to do what I was doing before in order to avoid being labeled with a word you consider being a pejorative? (And I still don't think "grognard" is pejorative.)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Who decries anything just because it's new? I like older D&D, but don't like newer D&D, but I buy plenty of newer game products (much to Goodman Games and others' pleasure, much to my wife's displeasure). The issue isn't, and never is, new game versus old game. It's game I like versus game I don't like. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Just because we're not particularly interested in what WotC has to offer in terms of D&D, doesn't mean we're bunkered down. If you were to actually spend some time reading some of the "old school" blogs and websites, such as Grognardia, you'd see a fairly substantial portion of the webspace is given over to reviewing and even creating <em>NEW</em> material. </p><p></p><p>Personally, WotC's conception of what D&D should be is so obviously different from mine that I have a hard time believing that anything they put out that was aimed at the other "mes" out there would grab a hold of us.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And I get exasperated anytime anyone's complaints about older versions basically boils down to, "My DM was 12 and didn't have the slightest idea of what he was doing." There's a lot of ignorance out there, and it doesn't seem to have an edition preference.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Of course, the remedy to this is to not put out edition after edition after edition, and instead try to get an "evergreen" edition into every house in America... but that's a subject for another tread.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I've got 1e compatible monster books that have come out recently. <a href="http://www.lulu.com/product/paperback/monsters-of-myth/660822" target="_blank">Monsters of Myth</a> and <a href="http://http://www.rpgnow.com/product_info.php?products_id=62837" target="_blank">Malevolent and Benign</a>. Both are very good. Anyone remotely interested in 1e style monsters should pick them up. If I want the 4e DMG advice, I can always - y'know - buy them, just like the 4e DM can still go back to the great advice in the 1e DMG.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rogueattorney, post: 5224006, member: 17551"] Why do I have to try out 4e or anything else? If I'm perfectly happy doing what I'm doing, why do I have to try to new thing before continuing to do what I was doing before in order to avoid being labeled with a word you consider being a pejorative? (And I still don't think "grognard" is pejorative.) Who decries anything just because it's new? I like older D&D, but don't like newer D&D, but I buy plenty of newer game products (much to Goodman Games and others' pleasure, much to my wife's displeasure). The issue isn't, and never is, new game versus old game. It's game I like versus game I don't like. Just because we're not particularly interested in what WotC has to offer in terms of D&D, doesn't mean we're bunkered down. If you were to actually spend some time reading some of the "old school" blogs and websites, such as Grognardia, you'd see a fairly substantial portion of the webspace is given over to reviewing and even creating [I]NEW[/I] material. Personally, WotC's conception of what D&D should be is so obviously different from mine that I have a hard time believing that anything they put out that was aimed at the other "mes" out there would grab a hold of us. And I get exasperated anytime anyone's complaints about older versions basically boils down to, "My DM was 12 and didn't have the slightest idea of what he was doing." There's a lot of ignorance out there, and it doesn't seem to have an edition preference. Of course, the remedy to this is to not put out edition after edition after edition, and instead try to get an "evergreen" edition into every house in America... but that's a subject for another tread. I've got 1e compatible monster books that have come out recently. [URL="http://www.lulu.com/product/paperback/monsters-of-myth/660822"]Monsters of Myth[/URL] and [URL="http://http://www.rpgnow.com/product_info.php?products_id=62837"]Malevolent and Benign[/URL]. Both are very good. Anyone remotely interested in 1e style monsters should pick them up. If I want the 4e DMG advice, I can always - y'know - buy them, just like the 4e DM can still go back to the great advice in the 1e DMG. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Grognard good...grognard bad
Top