Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Grr. Return of the King makes me angry.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="barsoomcore" data-source="post: 1882446" data-attributes="member: 812"><p>Umbran: I guess I'm not being clear. OF COURSE in the movies that PJ made, you couldn't just tack on another hour of The Scouring and expect it to work. I'm trying to say that I believe there's a way to create films in which the Scouring IS the climax. The existing films are not those films, I grant you, and so the setup they provide is not going to give us what we want.</p><p></p><p>Obviously you PUT the hobbits under stress and tension. I'm not talking about "Being True To Tolkien's Vision" or anything like that. I'm saying I LIKE the Scouring and to me it's the climactic moment, the most exciting part of the whole story. In order to translate that to a movie you'd have to make a lot of choices, and some of those choices would involve changing what Tolkien wrote, because, as pretty much everyone has pointed out already, what works in a book doesn't necessarily work onscreen.</p><p></p><p>I would need to spend some more thinking time to determine exactly WHY I find it so thrilling, so rewarding, and then more thinking time to figure out how to bring it to the screen. But I think I would start such a project with exactly that end in mind, to have the hobbits leave the Shire with the intent of protecting it, and return to find that all their efforts, while not exactly in vain, still were unable to prevent the slow onset of change. That's the movie I would want to make, and so I would make choices about what to beat over my audience's head and so on keeping that in mind.</p><p></p><p>Is that clear? Arguments like, "Well but they spent the whole first two and a half movies making this impossible" aren't relevant to the point I'm trying to make, nor are arguments like, "I think the books behave in such and such a fashion." I'm talking about completely redoing the movies and I'm talking about making choices as regards to representing the source material in a cinematically powerful way that might involve changing the text of the books.</p><p></p><p>Obviously nobody's ever going to give me the money to do this, so I'm just making stuff up in my head for fun. I don't think the existing movies would have been IMPROVED by adding the Scouring -- I'm just saying I don't think it's true that it's "impossible" to make a movie that includes it. Given all the other choices PJ had made, it was a good idea to leave it out.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="barsoomcore, post: 1882446, member: 812"] Umbran: I guess I'm not being clear. OF COURSE in the movies that PJ made, you couldn't just tack on another hour of The Scouring and expect it to work. I'm trying to say that I believe there's a way to create films in which the Scouring IS the climax. The existing films are not those films, I grant you, and so the setup they provide is not going to give us what we want. Obviously you PUT the hobbits under stress and tension. I'm not talking about "Being True To Tolkien's Vision" or anything like that. I'm saying I LIKE the Scouring and to me it's the climactic moment, the most exciting part of the whole story. In order to translate that to a movie you'd have to make a lot of choices, and some of those choices would involve changing what Tolkien wrote, because, as pretty much everyone has pointed out already, what works in a book doesn't necessarily work onscreen. I would need to spend some more thinking time to determine exactly WHY I find it so thrilling, so rewarding, and then more thinking time to figure out how to bring it to the screen. But I think I would start such a project with exactly that end in mind, to have the hobbits leave the Shire with the intent of protecting it, and return to find that all their efforts, while not exactly in vain, still were unable to prevent the slow onset of change. That's the movie I would want to make, and so I would make choices about what to beat over my audience's head and so on keeping that in mind. Is that clear? Arguments like, "Well but they spent the whole first two and a half movies making this impossible" aren't relevant to the point I'm trying to make, nor are arguments like, "I think the books behave in such and such a fashion." I'm talking about completely redoing the movies and I'm talking about making choices as regards to representing the source material in a cinematically powerful way that might involve changing the text of the books. Obviously nobody's ever going to give me the money to do this, so I'm just making stuff up in my head for fun. I don't think the existing movies would have been IMPROVED by adding the Scouring -- I'm just saying I don't think it's true that it's "impossible" to make a movie that includes it. Given all the other choices PJ had made, it was a good idea to leave it out. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Grr. Return of the King makes me angry.
Top