Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
GSL and the .pdf market
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kenmarable" data-source="post: 4186230" data-attributes="member: 40359"><p>Actually that's conflating two separate issues.</p><p></p><p><strong>#1: End of the d20 STL</strong></p><p>This has been officially mentioned by WotC and deals with the fact that they are retiring the d20 logo this year. So all products must be updated to remove the logo if they want to sell them regardless of any future publishing plans. So after Jan 1, no PDF can have the d20 logo, and only printed products that are out in the distribution chain can have them. </p><p></p><p>That is a separate issue from the OP, which is:</p><p></p><p><strong>#2: 4e GSL "poison pill"</strong></p><p>This was brought up by Clark to clarify some confusing comments, and has not been denied (and some of The Rouse's comments aren't "yes, that is the case" clear, but they are pretty darn close). This issue is that the 4e GSL will (allegedly) contain a clause if want to publish 4e products under the GSL, your company can never use the OGL again. Either you still publish OGL products OR you publish 4e GSL products.</p><p></p><p>The question the original poster was asking was - so what about companies that want to go 4e, but have a very large PDF back catalog? And the answer is, "We don't know." *shrug* </p><p></p><p>They have said that you can update your product and re-release it for 4e, but that might be impossible for any products that contain OGC from a different company. *shrug* We don't know yet.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Those restrictions are in place for the 4e GSL and fantasy RPG products (technically I think it's the "D&D GSL"), but there will be another license down the road for non-fantasy products, and we have no idea what the terms of those will be.</p><p></p><p>Of course, on the one hand, we already have M&M, True20, etc., so why do we need more? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> But if you want 4e inspired ones, then, yes, you will have to be very careful. M&M is up in the air and depends on the future license. True20 type of game would have a very difficult time, but if you did it while avoiding character creation rules, or released it under the future license to be determined, it could still work. I'm not familiar enough with C&C to know for sure, but I do know that with Arcana Evolved, you could rip out the character creation rules, and still have a product that looks 99% the same. It's not stand alone, but the real value in that book isn't the XP charts and how to roll stats by any means. So Arcana Evolved and possibly even Iron Heroes (though I'm less familiar with it) could live just as happily under the 4e GSL as they could with the OGL with only some minor changes.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kenmarable, post: 4186230, member: 40359"] Actually that's conflating two separate issues. [b]#1: End of the d20 STL[/b] This has been officially mentioned by WotC and deals with the fact that they are retiring the d20 logo this year. So all products must be updated to remove the logo if they want to sell them regardless of any future publishing plans. So after Jan 1, no PDF can have the d20 logo, and only printed products that are out in the distribution chain can have them. That is a separate issue from the OP, which is: [b]#2: 4e GSL "poison pill"[/b] This was brought up by Clark to clarify some confusing comments, and has not been denied (and some of The Rouse's comments aren't "yes, that is the case" clear, but they are pretty darn close). This issue is that the 4e GSL will (allegedly) contain a clause if want to publish 4e products under the GSL, your company can never use the OGL again. Either you still publish OGL products OR you publish 4e GSL products. The question the original poster was asking was - so what about companies that want to go 4e, but have a very large PDF back catalog? And the answer is, "We don't know." *shrug* They have said that you can update your product and re-release it for 4e, but that might be impossible for any products that contain OGC from a different company. *shrug* We don't know yet. Those restrictions are in place for the 4e GSL and fantasy RPG products (technically I think it's the "D&D GSL"), but there will be another license down the road for non-fantasy products, and we have no idea what the terms of those will be. Of course, on the one hand, we already have M&M, True20, etc., so why do we need more? ;) But if you want 4e inspired ones, then, yes, you will have to be very careful. M&M is up in the air and depends on the future license. True20 type of game would have a very difficult time, but if you did it while avoiding character creation rules, or released it under the future license to be determined, it could still work. I'm not familiar enough with C&C to know for sure, but I do know that with Arcana Evolved, you could rip out the character creation rules, and still have a product that looks 99% the same. It's not stand alone, but the real value in that book isn't the XP charts and how to roll stats by any means. So Arcana Evolved and possibly even Iron Heroes (though I'm less familiar with it) could live just as happily under the 4e GSL as they could with the OGL with only some minor changes. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
GSL and the .pdf market
Top