Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
GSL news.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="cybernetic" data-source="post: 4186128" data-attributes="member: 1542"><p>Actually, Spycraft did it under the old d20 STL license. The first Spycraft book, which I happen to have in my bag right now, did not "Describe a process for Creating a Character". It simply gave different options to use when creating a character and refered you to teh 3rd Edition PHB for the rules to put the peices together.</p><p></p><p>On another note. My personal opinion on the situation, from both the perspective of a writer and a gamer, is that in the end I think this will be good for gaming. I think WotC is playing this round smart. They're obviously very confident and worked very hard on 4th Edition and I think they want any 3PP who supports it to put a lot into their products as well. By forcing 3PP who work with 4th Edition to turn their back on 3.X, it puts their focus on making better products for 4th Edition. It does seem as though it is going to exclude some of the bigger names in 3PP from supporting 4th Edition (which is a shame), but that has a positive side as well. Those companies will be able to focus more on their own systems to give us great non-4th Edition products as well! It'll also give us some new blood and has the potential of giving us a new generation of 3PP.</p><p></p><p>Grymn Studios has been developing an OGL-based game for the passed few years. They system is compete and the setting for the game has been developed. I have faith in the system I created (it is OGL but diverges from d20 quite a bit). However, It is likely that it will never be published, because we will be going 4th Edition. The setting we had developed actually fits perfectly with the feel and implied "setting" of 4th Edition D&D, almost too perfectly <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />. The system I developed (which pre-dates the setting) will either go onto my own personal book self or I'll shop it to a 3.X Publisher down the road.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="cybernetic, post: 4186128, member: 1542"] Actually, Spycraft did it under the old d20 STL license. The first Spycraft book, which I happen to have in my bag right now, did not "Describe a process for Creating a Character". It simply gave different options to use when creating a character and refered you to teh 3rd Edition PHB for the rules to put the peices together. On another note. My personal opinion on the situation, from both the perspective of a writer and a gamer, is that in the end I think this will be good for gaming. I think WotC is playing this round smart. They're obviously very confident and worked very hard on 4th Edition and I think they want any 3PP who supports it to put a lot into their products as well. By forcing 3PP who work with 4th Edition to turn their back on 3.X, it puts their focus on making better products for 4th Edition. It does seem as though it is going to exclude some of the bigger names in 3PP from supporting 4th Edition (which is a shame), but that has a positive side as well. Those companies will be able to focus more on their own systems to give us great non-4th Edition products as well! It'll also give us some new blood and has the potential of giving us a new generation of 3PP. Grymn Studios has been developing an OGL-based game for the passed few years. They system is compete and the setting for the game has been developed. I have faith in the system I created (it is OGL but diverges from d20 quite a bit). However, It is likely that it will never be published, because we will be going 4th Edition. The setting we had developed actually fits perfectly with the feel and implied "setting" of 4th Edition D&D, almost too perfectly ;). The system I developed (which pre-dates the setting) will either go onto my own personal book self or I'll shop it to a 3.X Publisher down the road. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
GSL news.
Top