Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mouseferatu" data-source="post: 4135652" data-attributes="member: 1288">All right, I think I see what's happening. (And I think it's why we've been talking past each other throughout most of this exchange. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />)I've been limiting my comments, more or less, exclusively to the issue of how the existence, or lack thereof, of an OGL (or similar license) impacts things like the creative team. You're speaking in more general terms, about how legal concerns in general can impact the creative team.So when I say things like &quot;no impact,&quot; I'm referring specifically and strictly to the OGL issue, but you're reading it as &quot;no legal impact at all, ever.&quot; And when you talk about them claiming or trademarking IP, I've been reading it as &quot;for purposes of eliminating said license,&quot; when you didn't mean it that narrowly.Sound about right?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mouseferatu, post: 4135652, member: 1288"] All right, I think I see what's happening. (And I think it's why we've been talking past each other throughout most of this exchange. ;)) I've been limiting my comments, more or less, [i]exclusively[/i] to the issue of how the existence, or lack thereof, of an OGL (or similar license) impacts things like the creative team. You're speaking in more general terms, about how legal concerns [i]in general[/i] can impact the creative team. So when I say things like "no impact," I'm referring specifically and strictly to the OGL issue, but you're reading it as "no legal impact at all, ever." And when you talk about them claiming or trademarking IP, I've been reading it as "for purposes of eliminating said license," when you didn't mean it that narrowly. Sound about right? [/QUOTE]

Verification