Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Guns in your world, and in mine!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="doctorbadwolf" data-source="post: 6904071" data-attributes="member: 6704184"><p>Very few things in Trek are lacking in any scientific basis. From Q to Warp Drives, it's all stuff we know might be possible, but are varying degrees of removal away from testing for/developing further than the theoretical. Theoretical=\=impossible, or magical. </p><p>Science is what makes a given work of speculative fiction science fiction, while the fantastical and wondrous make a work fantasy. Combining those can make something both, or not, depending on presentation, mostly. </p><p></p><p>Mall of which is part of a nit pickey tangent that has nothing to do with the setting I proposed, since absolutely nothing about that proposal even requires any lack of mystery and wonder. The common man being able to draw basic glyphs to cool a box full of food or heat a pot (or reservoir) of water doesn't make a setting "not fantasy", but even if it did (and it definately doesn't), that element of a setting doesn't preclude the elements that you insist are what make Eberron a fantasy setting. </p><p></p><p>A world where physical magic follows rules, where magically created fire still follows the same laws as mundane Fire, except as acted upon by magic, and where magic is studied at the same schools as physics and chemistry, can still have gods and tree spirits and prophecies. And either way, isn't any less a fantasy setting than one where magic is unknowable and even guys like Modenkeinen are basically just guessing, apparently. </p><p></p><p>Note, I roll my eyes at this idea of wizards not really understanding how spells work. IMO, it is 100% nonsensical. Arcane magic is predictable, follows hard and fast rules, and can be mastered and advanced through rigorous analytical study. The fact that sorcerers and warlocks don't have to is irrelevant. A wizard can study their magic and go, "yeah, that is the same fireball spell I cast, your body is just replacing the material components with an exertion of will and physical energy. Fastinating!" And then go into a rant about the mechanics of energy manipulation to create the fireball effect. </p><p></p><p>Warlocks are a similar case, except by the core fluff their spells come from a patron, so they've no need to actually understand them any more than a gunslinger need understand gunpowder in order to shoot people well. </p><p></p><p>As for bards, they go to college to learn most of their magic. Said magic is just as predictable and based on solid rules as wizardry. </p><p></p><p>Re: Harry Potter. My eyes are starting to hurt. HP magic is entirely scientific. It works on knowable laws/principles, and can be mastered through rigorous analytical study, and advances all the time due to said study. There is plenty they don't yet understand, and knowledge that has been lost to time, because there didn't used to be schools and careful records. </p><p>There is no reason to beleive that any artifact in the world couldn't be replicated with the same knowledge that was used to make it, barring a need for circumstances that no longer exist, or happy infrequently, etc. all of it is knowable, just as all of physics is knowable. In both cases, not all of it is known, but unknown=\=unknowable.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="doctorbadwolf, post: 6904071, member: 6704184"] Very few things in Trek are lacking in any scientific basis. From Q to Warp Drives, it's all stuff we know might be possible, but are varying degrees of removal away from testing for/developing further than the theoretical. Theoretical=\=impossible, or magical. Science is what makes a given work of speculative fiction science fiction, while the fantastical and wondrous make a work fantasy. Combining those can make something both, or not, depending on presentation, mostly. Mall of which is part of a nit pickey tangent that has nothing to do with the setting I proposed, since absolutely nothing about that proposal even requires any lack of mystery and wonder. The common man being able to draw basic glyphs to cool a box full of food or heat a pot (or reservoir) of water doesn't make a setting "not fantasy", but even if it did (and it definately doesn't), that element of a setting doesn't preclude the elements that you insist are what make Eberron a fantasy setting. A world where physical magic follows rules, where magically created fire still follows the same laws as mundane Fire, except as acted upon by magic, and where magic is studied at the same schools as physics and chemistry, can still have gods and tree spirits and prophecies. And either way, isn't any less a fantasy setting than one where magic is unknowable and even guys like Modenkeinen are basically just guessing, apparently. Note, I roll my eyes at this idea of wizards not really understanding how spells work. IMO, it is 100% nonsensical. Arcane magic is predictable, follows hard and fast rules, and can be mastered and advanced through rigorous analytical study. The fact that sorcerers and warlocks don't have to is irrelevant. A wizard can study their magic and go, "yeah, that is the same fireball spell I cast, your body is just replacing the material components with an exertion of will and physical energy. Fastinating!" And then go into a rant about the mechanics of energy manipulation to create the fireball effect. Warlocks are a similar case, except by the core fluff their spells come from a patron, so they've no need to actually understand them any more than a gunslinger need understand gunpowder in order to shoot people well. As for bards, they go to college to learn most of their magic. Said magic is just as predictable and based on solid rules as wizardry. Re: Harry Potter. My eyes are starting to hurt. HP magic is entirely scientific. It works on knowable laws/principles, and can be mastered through rigorous analytical study, and advances all the time due to said study. There is plenty they don't yet understand, and knowledge that has been lost to time, because there didn't used to be schools and careful records. There is no reason to beleive that any artifact in the world couldn't be replicated with the same knowledge that was used to make it, barring a need for circumstances that no longer exist, or happy infrequently, etc. all of it is knowable, just as all of physics is knowable. In both cases, not all of it is known, but unknown=\=unknowable. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Guns in your world, and in mine!
Top