Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mark CMG" data-source="post: 6062597" data-attributes="member: 10479"><p>I don't know.&nbsp; &quot;Leak&quot; might not have been the most precise word.&nbsp; I think they just put up some placeholders for the website, not expecting many to necessarily stumble across it in November but figuring if anyone did they'd garner some info by way of an email address or two, then planned to make their formal announcement in December.&nbsp; Obviously, that didn't work out as planned.&nbsp; Anyway, I'm not personally involved, though I know some of the folks who are personally, and at the end of the day the content will either draw folks to it or not.&nbsp; I've no doubt it is in my own wheelhouse, so I'm sure I'll like most or all of what is in it.&nbsp; Yet it comes down to the fact that it's a magazine (in an era when mags aren't doing very strongly) with a limited print run, a lot of folks on board, and even more contributing.&nbsp; Obviously, no one is looking to get rich or turn huge profits with this venture, so I don't judge it with the same microscope I reserve for larger companies eking out big profits in gaming, such as they are.&nbsp; We'll see. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="Mark CMG, post: 6062597, member: 10479"] I don't know. "Leak" might not have been the most precise word. I think they just put up some placeholders for the website, not expecting many to necessarily stumble across it in November but figuring if anyone did they'd garner some info by way of an email address or two, then planned to make their formal announcement in December. Obviously, that didn't work out as planned. Anyway, I'm not personally involved, though I know some of the folks who are personally, and at the end of the day the content will either draw folks to it or not. I've no doubt it is in my own wheelhouse, so I'm sure I'll like most or all of what is in it. Yet it comes down to the fact that it's a magazine (in an era when mags aren't doing very strongly) with a limited print run, a lot of folks on board, and even more contributing. Obviously, no one is looking to get rich or turn huge profits with this venture, so I don't judge it with the same microscope I reserve for larger companies eking out big profits in gaming, such as they are. We'll see. :) [/QUOTE]

Verification