Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="malcolm_n" data-source="post: 5013892" data-attributes="member: 63154">hehe, looking better.&nbsp; Um, I think you overshot just a bit on the Dragon's heart feature this time.&nbsp; Giving the class a static con mod bonus to saves AND an automatic save when so affected is far too powerful for a feature alone.&nbsp; Maybe by epic tier and requiring a feat for it in particular.Consider as I posted above, with a free save when affected and a bonus to death saves equal to con mod (similar to the original).&nbsp; **Edit** An interesting thought occurred when reading over Dragon's Heart again.&nbsp; If you made it an immediate reaction, so that it self limits to once per round and restricts other actions, I'd say it's fine as is.&nbsp; It'd also make an interesting niche choice for the class.With that said, I'll dig more deeply into powers when I get some time. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="malcolm_n, post: 5013892, member: 63154"] hehe, looking better. Um, I think you overshot just a bit on the Dragon's heart feature this time. Giving the class a static con mod bonus to saves AND an automatic save when so affected is far too powerful for a feature alone. Maybe by epic tier and requiring a feat for it in particular. Consider as I posted above, with a free save when affected and a bonus to death saves equal to con mod (similar to the original). **Edit** An interesting thought occurred when reading over Dragon's Heart again. If you made it an immediate reaction, so that it self limits to once per round and restricts other actions, I'd say it's fine as is. It'd also make an interesting niche choice for the class. With that said, I'll dig more deeply into powers when I get some time. :) [/QUOTE]

Verification