Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Jolly_Blackburn" data-source="post: 5992335" data-attributes="member: 44101">Just wanted to add that despite the backstory to how the HM/AD&amp;D license came about we had a very good relatioship with WOTC.&nbsp; Besides HM we were doing the D&amp;D comic D&amp;D branded campaign setting material (Kingdoms of Kalamar) etc. Which meant LOTS of conversations/meetings to move product through the review process. Hardest part of it all as I recall was the fact there seemed to be a constant turn over in employees on WOTC's end and we found ourselves dealing with new faces (some of which handled the process differently).I can recall only a few products that were troublesome as far as getting them approved. Greyhack being one of them. We ended up abandoning that one because the approval process was taking too long and the license was nearing its end.Otherwise they did a great job working with us on approving product.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Jolly_Blackburn, post: 5992335, member: 44101"] Just wanted to add that despite the backstory to how the HM/AD&D license came about we had a very good relatioship with WOTC. Besides HM we were doing the D&D comic D&D branded campaign setting material (Kingdoms of Kalamar) etc. Which meant LOTS of conversations/meetings to move product through the review process. Hardest part of it all as I recall was the fact there seemed to be a constant turn over in employees on WOTC's end and we found ourselves dealing with new faces (some of which handled the process differently). I can recall only a few products that were troublesome as far as getting them approved. Greyhack being one of them. We ended up abandoning that one because the approval process was taking too long and the license was nearing its end. Otherwise they did a great job working with us on approving product. [/QUOTE]

Verification