Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Half-Orc Two-Weapon Fighter: Is There Any Point?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="two" data-source="post: 3032055" data-attributes="member: 9002"><p>+++????????+++</p><p></p><p>This cracks me up.</p><p></p><p>Having 2+ chances to do damage does, in fact, make it more likly you will do SOME damage.</p><p></p><p>At the same time, it makes it less likely you will do, for example, 80% of the maximum damage you are capable. Your damage results get bunched up in the middle more.</p><p></p><p>Example: 50% chance for main, 50% off. Both hit 25% of the time, and you now have a decent chance of doing 80% of max. damage for the character. (must roll well on 2d6 or 1d6 + 1d8).</p><p></p><p>Both miss 25% of the time, doing 0.</p><p></p><p>One attacks hits 50% of the time doing 10-50% of max damage for the character.</p><p></p><p>Compare to greatsword:</p><p></p><p>50% to hit. When it hits, it has an decent chance of doing 80% max damage (see 25% case above). Note that even the lowest damage output for the greatsword is quite good, in the case above min = 12!</p><p></p><p>50% of the time it just misses.</p><p></p><p>Longwindedly, yes, 2 weapon fighters hit more and do less damage on average. This is balanced over the long term by the greatsword which hits less often (fewer attacks) but does way more damage per hit and has a damage output that is less "bunched" in the middle.</p><p></p><p>{to think about it another way, the 2 weapon user has to get 2 criticals with 2 weapons to maximize their damage; it's much easier obviously just to roll a critical with one greatsword}</p><p></p><p>I'm not "overlooking" the fact the 2 weapon users hit more. It's that it is not mathematically relevant. It's taken into account using estimated damage. They hit more often and do a lot less damage.</p><p></p><p>"The greatsword's total exceeds both the longsword and shortsword put together. However, this is mitigated by having two chances to damage a target versus only one (which is what the "2WF suxorz" folks generally don't take into account). "</p><p></p><p>It's not mitigated by this at all. The times you hit and do less damage with one of your 2 weapons and DROP the enemy equals the times the greatsword hits and does a lot and drops the enemy (which the 2 weapon user could not match).</p><p></p><p>They cancel out, roughly, even when you consider game play.</p><p></p><p></p><p>++++++++</p><p></p><p>"One odd thing about Two's rationale is that he says it's somehow different for rogues than for fighters. The same "delivery system" strategy that a 2WF uses with his sneak attack damage also applies to other forms of bonus damage, such as Weapon Specialization or Favored Enemy, magical weapon bonuses and so forth."</p><p></p><p>Yes totally. You need to stack these "flat damage" bonuses. The best is sneak attack. You can rarely if ever get enough bonus out of Weapon Specialization, favored enemy, magic weapon, etc. to make up for the loss of feats and $ by the greatsword user.</p><p></p><p>Nothing comes close to sneak attack damage. That's why it is the only thing that really works for these types of builds.</p><p></p><p>Favored enemy does not work; the 2 weapon builds get to apply it with both weapons, the greatsword user just once. FE bonuses are just not high enough to offset the sucky 2 weapon damage. Plus, FE only applies... to FE.</p><p></p><p>magical weapon bonuses, similarly get very expensive with 2 weapons.</p><p></p><p>2 +1 Flaming Acidic Cold short swords = 64K</p><p>1 +1 Flaming Acidic Cold Sonic greatsword = 50K with 14K left over</p><p></p><p>(of course these are sub-par weapons for levels 8+, much better is +1 Holy X Y Z)</p><p></p><p>Point is, the 2 weapon user pays more for weapon enchantments which get increasingly meaningless when levels rise (many, many monsters have fire/cold/acid resistance). Weee!</p><p></p><p>+++++++++++++++</p><p></p><p></p><p>"For the cost of three feats (or two for a dwarf), the total damage output matches the greatsword's, while having two chances to inflict damage rather than one tilts the scales (as SteveC points out, we're already in a situation where AC is effectively boosted by taking a -2 penalty)."</p><p></p><p>FOR THE COST OF THREE FEATS!</p><p></p><p>Go team go! You spend three feats and now match the vanilla greatsword user!</p><p></p><p>(the greatsword fighter has in the meantime used the 3 feats on PB Shot, Rapid Shot, Precise Shot, and is an excellent ranged attacker as well as matching the 2 weapon user in melee, or heck, just spent the feats on Weapon Focus, Improved Weapon Focus, Weapon Specialization, and is killing the 2 weapon user again in both full round attack damage and most egregiously charges/single attack situations/aoo's).</p><p></p><p>C'mon. You are seriously going to spend three feats to match the greatsword user and calling it ... even?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="two, post: 3032055, member: 9002"] +++????????+++ This cracks me up. Having 2+ chances to do damage does, in fact, make it more likly you will do SOME damage. At the same time, it makes it less likely you will do, for example, 80% of the maximum damage you are capable. Your damage results get bunched up in the middle more. Example: 50% chance for main, 50% off. Both hit 25% of the time, and you now have a decent chance of doing 80% of max. damage for the character. (must roll well on 2d6 or 1d6 + 1d8). Both miss 25% of the time, doing 0. One attacks hits 50% of the time doing 10-50% of max damage for the character. Compare to greatsword: 50% to hit. When it hits, it has an decent chance of doing 80% max damage (see 25% case above). Note that even the lowest damage output for the greatsword is quite good, in the case above min = 12! 50% of the time it just misses. Longwindedly, yes, 2 weapon fighters hit more and do less damage on average. This is balanced over the long term by the greatsword which hits less often (fewer attacks) but does way more damage per hit and has a damage output that is less "bunched" in the middle. {to think about it another way, the 2 weapon user has to get 2 criticals with 2 weapons to maximize their damage; it's much easier obviously just to roll a critical with one greatsword} I'm not "overlooking" the fact the 2 weapon users hit more. It's that it is not mathematically relevant. It's taken into account using estimated damage. They hit more often and do a lot less damage. "The greatsword's total exceeds both the longsword and shortsword put together. However, this is mitigated by having two chances to damage a target versus only one (which is what the "2WF suxorz" folks generally don't take into account). " It's not mitigated by this at all. The times you hit and do less damage with one of your 2 weapons and DROP the enemy equals the times the greatsword hits and does a lot and drops the enemy (which the 2 weapon user could not match). They cancel out, roughly, even when you consider game play. ++++++++ "One odd thing about Two's rationale is that he says it's somehow different for rogues than for fighters. The same "delivery system" strategy that a 2WF uses with his sneak attack damage also applies to other forms of bonus damage, such as Weapon Specialization or Favored Enemy, magical weapon bonuses and so forth." Yes totally. You need to stack these "flat damage" bonuses. The best is sneak attack. You can rarely if ever get enough bonus out of Weapon Specialization, favored enemy, magic weapon, etc. to make up for the loss of feats and $ by the greatsword user. Nothing comes close to sneak attack damage. That's why it is the only thing that really works for these types of builds. Favored enemy does not work; the 2 weapon builds get to apply it with both weapons, the greatsword user just once. FE bonuses are just not high enough to offset the sucky 2 weapon damage. Plus, FE only applies... to FE. magical weapon bonuses, similarly get very expensive with 2 weapons. 2 +1 Flaming Acidic Cold short swords = 64K 1 +1 Flaming Acidic Cold Sonic greatsword = 50K with 14K left over (of course these are sub-par weapons for levels 8+, much better is +1 Holy X Y Z) Point is, the 2 weapon user pays more for weapon enchantments which get increasingly meaningless when levels rise (many, many monsters have fire/cold/acid resistance). Weee! +++++++++++++++ "For the cost of three feats (or two for a dwarf), the total damage output matches the greatsword's, while having two chances to inflict damage rather than one tilts the scales (as SteveC points out, we're already in a situation where AC is effectively boosted by taking a -2 penalty)." FOR THE COST OF THREE FEATS! Go team go! You spend three feats and now match the vanilla greatsword user! (the greatsword fighter has in the meantime used the 3 feats on PB Shot, Rapid Shot, Precise Shot, and is an excellent ranged attacker as well as matching the 2 weapon user in melee, or heck, just spent the feats on Weapon Focus, Improved Weapon Focus, Weapon Specialization, and is killing the 2 weapon user again in both full round attack damage and most egregiously charges/single attack situations/aoo's). C'mon. You are seriously going to spend three feats to match the greatsword user and calling it ... even? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Half-Orc Two-Weapon Fighter: Is There Any Point?
Top