Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Half-orcs and why people think they are/aren't powerful
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Terath Ninir" data-source="post: 1670235" data-attributes="member: 47"><p>On this board and others, there have been a number of fights over half-orcs, with some people violently proclaiming them wonderful or even over-powered, and others proclaiming them weak and useless, with very few people (at least amongst those who post) anywhere in the middle.</p><p></p><p>Now, the usual explenation of why people have such opposite opinions is playing style. If you dungeon crawl, half-orcs are great; if you do city-based adventures with lots of diplomacy, they suck. I've never found this explenation satisfactory. I'm a power-gamer, sometimes a munchkin, and I would *never* play a half-orc.</p><p></p><p>I think I've found the real explenation, though. After many an argument, it suddenly occured to me that there was a real difference between the two camps of half-orc haters and half-orc likers: how they generate ability scores.</p><p></p><p>If you create characters by point buy, the half-orcs bonus is more important than its penalties. The system is skewed in such a way that it's almost impossible, even under the most generous allotment of points, to start out with an ability score of 18. Even a 16 is very high. Thus, the +2 Str bonus of the half-orc is very, very attractive. You can buy a Str of 16 and get it up to 18 -- which is about the only way you'll have a starting character with a Str score that high.</p><p></p><p>On the other end, even with two penalties, the half-orc isn't that weakened. The absolute worst Int and Cha scores you can have is 6. Buying a score up to 12 only costs 4 points each, so for 8 points you can have no penalties whatsover. Or you can just spend 4 to remove the Int penalty. While it does eat up some points to compensate, it's not that bad.</p><p></p><p>However, if you create characters with dice rolling, scores of 18 are not uncommon. Let's face it: if you're rolling dice to generate ability scores, it's highly likely that you're not just going to roll 4d6 six times. You're probably going to do that several times until you get a "decent" character -- and you're probably not cheating, either. Your DM is highly likely to be going along with you. For dice-rolled characters, scores of 18 are not all that uncommon. It's kind of expected, really. So getting an 18 Str score is really not all that special. And, while it's kind of nice to have a 20 Str, it doesn't mean as much under this system. It's not nearly as hard to get or as special.</p><p></p><p>The flip side of dice rolling is that your minimum scores are 3, not 6, which is a HUGE difference. If you roll up a character that is 18 18 15 14 6 4, you're probably going to keep it. But those penalties are going to really, really, really hurt now. You won't just be somewhat dumb and uncharismatic -- you're utterly hopeless. You can compensate for one penalty, but two is much tougher.</p><p></p><p>So that, I think, is why some people think half-orcs are fine, and others think they suck. If you use the official character generation method, their penalties outweigh their benefits. If you use the optional non-standard method, their bonus outweighs even two penalties. </p><p></p><p>So. What do y'all think of my analysis?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Terath Ninir, post: 1670235, member: 47"] On this board and others, there have been a number of fights over half-orcs, with some people violently proclaiming them wonderful or even over-powered, and others proclaiming them weak and useless, with very few people (at least amongst those who post) anywhere in the middle. Now, the usual explenation of why people have such opposite opinions is playing style. If you dungeon crawl, half-orcs are great; if you do city-based adventures with lots of diplomacy, they suck. I've never found this explenation satisfactory. I'm a power-gamer, sometimes a munchkin, and I would *never* play a half-orc. I think I've found the real explenation, though. After many an argument, it suddenly occured to me that there was a real difference between the two camps of half-orc haters and half-orc likers: how they generate ability scores. If you create characters by point buy, the half-orcs bonus is more important than its penalties. The system is skewed in such a way that it's almost impossible, even under the most generous allotment of points, to start out with an ability score of 18. Even a 16 is very high. Thus, the +2 Str bonus of the half-orc is very, very attractive. You can buy a Str of 16 and get it up to 18 -- which is about the only way you'll have a starting character with a Str score that high. On the other end, even with two penalties, the half-orc isn't that weakened. The absolute worst Int and Cha scores you can have is 6. Buying a score up to 12 only costs 4 points each, so for 8 points you can have no penalties whatsover. Or you can just spend 4 to remove the Int penalty. While it does eat up some points to compensate, it's not that bad. However, if you create characters with dice rolling, scores of 18 are not uncommon. Let's face it: if you're rolling dice to generate ability scores, it's highly likely that you're not just going to roll 4d6 six times. You're probably going to do that several times until you get a "decent" character -- and you're probably not cheating, either. Your DM is highly likely to be going along with you. For dice-rolled characters, scores of 18 are not all that uncommon. It's kind of expected, really. So getting an 18 Str score is really not all that special. And, while it's kind of nice to have a 20 Str, it doesn't mean as much under this system. It's not nearly as hard to get or as special. The flip side of dice rolling is that your minimum scores are 3, not 6, which is a HUGE difference. If you roll up a character that is 18 18 15 14 6 4, you're probably going to keep it. But those penalties are going to really, really, really hurt now. You won't just be somewhat dumb and uncharismatic -- you're utterly hopeless. You can compensate for one penalty, but two is much tougher. So that, I think, is why some people think half-orcs are fine, and others think they suck. If you use the official character generation method, their penalties outweigh their benefits. If you use the optional non-standard method, their bonus outweighs even two penalties. So. What do y'all think of my analysis? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Half-orcs and why people think they are/aren't powerful
Top