Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Handicapped by lack of Power Points?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 2816054" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>Actually, I am not ignoring the remainder of the sentence. I am merely interpreting it differently from you. The entire sentence states "This class feature provides the character with the psionic power he needs to materialize his mind blade, <strong>if he has no power points otherwise.</strong>" </p><p></p><p>One interpretation of the bolded phrase here could be that PP are used to power it unless you have no PP, in which case Wild Talent powers it. I do not proscribe to that interpretation, but someone could make it.</p><p></p><p>My interpretation of the sentence is that Wild Talent supplies the power if the Soulknife has no PP.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Actually, the word "otherwise" implies no such thing.</p><p></p><p>The word "otherwise" could be used to indicate "outside of the Wild Talent" ability. But, that does not say anything about whether PP are required or not.</p><p></p><p>And your own words 'implies strongly" means that this phrase does not explicitly state that PP (and only PP) are required. That is an inference you are making, but it does not state that.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Some rules are spelled out. Your interpretation here is not, <strong>otherwise</strong>, we would not be discussing it. <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/laugh.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" /> </p><p></p><p></p><p>This sentence is not enough for everyone to interpret it your way. Additionally, every other time PP are required, the book explicitly states so. Why would this be an exception?</p><p></p><p>Hence, there are several things here:</p><p></p><p>1) Your interpretation requires a non-stated specific inference of this sentence.</p><p></p><p>2) Your interpretation indicates that some power which drains PP would take away this class ability when there are no such examples in the book. For example, Power Leech would be the ultimate anti-Soulknife power, much more powerful than Ego Whip is against Sorcerers.</p><p></p><p>3) Your interpretation has different rules for other psi-like abilities than this one.</p><p></p><p>4) Your interpretation is not fun for the player.</p><p></p><p>5) Your interpretation is not balanced. It is rare in the game for a character to lose a major class ability so easily, especially when the rules themselves do not explicitly state that it happens.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 2816054, member: 2011"] Actually, I am not ignoring the remainder of the sentence. I am merely interpreting it differently from you. The entire sentence states "This class feature provides the character with the psionic power he needs to materialize his mind blade, [b]if he has no power points otherwise.[/b]" One interpretation of the bolded phrase here could be that PP are used to power it unless you have no PP, in which case Wild Talent powers it. I do not proscribe to that interpretation, but someone could make it. My interpretation of the sentence is that Wild Talent supplies the power if the Soulknife has no PP. Actually, the word "otherwise" implies no such thing. The word "otherwise" could be used to indicate "outside of the Wild Talent" ability. But, that does not say anything about whether PP are required or not. And your own words 'implies strongly" means that this phrase does not explicitly state that PP (and only PP) are required. That is an inference you are making, but it does not state that. Some rules are spelled out. Your interpretation here is not, [b]otherwise[/b], we would not be discussing it. :lol: This sentence is not enough for everyone to interpret it your way. Additionally, every other time PP are required, the book explicitly states so. Why would this be an exception? Hence, there are several things here: 1) Your interpretation requires a non-stated specific inference of this sentence. 2) Your interpretation indicates that some power which drains PP would take away this class ability when there are no such examples in the book. For example, Power Leech would be the ultimate anti-Soulknife power, much more powerful than Ego Whip is against Sorcerers. 3) Your interpretation has different rules for other psi-like abilities than this one. 4) Your interpretation is not fun for the player. 5) Your interpretation is not balanced. It is rare in the game for a character to lose a major class ability so easily, especially when the rules themselves do not explicitly state that it happens. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Handicapped by lack of Power Points?
Top