Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Handling Cheating
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="S'mon" data-source="post: 5884569" data-attributes="member: 463"><p>IME it's a hard call which GM is the bigger Loser - the guy who inadvertently creates a TPK encounter thinking he's made a balanced encounter and lets it proceed to inevitable TPK, or the guy who inadvertently creates a TPK encounter thinking he's made a balanced encounter and fudges so the PCs win anyway.</p><p></p><p>IME though the latter (obvious fudging to turn TPK to victory) is seen as worse, by me and by most D&D players, and results in a total loss of respect for the GM and his game. Never again will the players see their victories as honestly earned, and IME when the GM does this the game soon dies. IME it's normally better just to play it out to the bitter end - maybe the PCs will escape (at least some of them), maybe they'll somehow achieve victory by their own efforts. Maybe they'll go down fighting heroically, in which case the GM should congratulate them and if possible make sure their deaths are meaningful. As GM I had a TPK in February 2011 and again last month, both times I was congratulated by the players on running a great battle! In the recent case it was the climax of the campaign, a 300-meets-Horatio doomed last stand on the bridge against the Necromancer and his thousand-ghoul army. Everyone died, but they gave the stonemasons time to collapse the bridge and for the citizenry to escape the town before it fell, saving two thousand lives.</p><p></p><p>However, there is a happy medium of the <em>absolute minimal 'out' </em>- if it would really be unfair to kill the PCs with no chance of survival, the GM puts the absolute lightest hand on the tiller in their favour, using something previously foreshadowed - part of the environment, a flaw in the villain's psyche, friendly NPCs, etc.</p><p></p><p>Eg: Fighter PC Conan has fought well against massive odds, but Rexxor the veteran High Priest of Doom has been over-statted - he's several levels higher, has massive DPR, and it's clear that it won't be Rexxor who runs out of hp first. So, a bit of divine intervention, IC and OOC - dead Rogue PC Valeria returns in a split-second vision that stuns Rexxor for a round, giving Conan just the chance he needs to turn the tide.</p><p></p><p>Or, more prosaically, in my own game recently, it was the first encounter for 3 brand new PCs. I turned what was scripted as a safe, illusionary encounter with 3 Pathfinder orcs, into a lethal ambush by 3 very real orcs, on the road just west of a country inn. Only I only had 3 players, not the 4 the module expects, plus Pathfinder orcs are heavily under-CR'd. The PCs fought well, but 2 were down, the last kept going only by his great AC. So I had travellers from the nearby inn hear the noise of battle and come out to assist the last PC - they only arrived in time to scare off the last orc, but it prevented a possible first-encounter TPK that would have been really unfair on the PCs. It was a perfectly plausible event to occur, but AIR I decided it by fiat rather than a probability check or pre-scripting. If that is fudging, to me it falls within acceptable parameters.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="S'mon, post: 5884569, member: 463"] IME it's a hard call which GM is the bigger Loser - the guy who inadvertently creates a TPK encounter thinking he's made a balanced encounter and lets it proceed to inevitable TPK, or the guy who inadvertently creates a TPK encounter thinking he's made a balanced encounter and fudges so the PCs win anyway. IME though the latter (obvious fudging to turn TPK to victory) is seen as worse, by me and by most D&D players, and results in a total loss of respect for the GM and his game. Never again will the players see their victories as honestly earned, and IME when the GM does this the game soon dies. IME it's normally better just to play it out to the bitter end - maybe the PCs will escape (at least some of them), maybe they'll somehow achieve victory by their own efforts. Maybe they'll go down fighting heroically, in which case the GM should congratulate them and if possible make sure their deaths are meaningful. As GM I had a TPK in February 2011 and again last month, both times I was congratulated by the players on running a great battle! In the recent case it was the climax of the campaign, a 300-meets-Horatio doomed last stand on the bridge against the Necromancer and his thousand-ghoul army. Everyone died, but they gave the stonemasons time to collapse the bridge and for the citizenry to escape the town before it fell, saving two thousand lives. However, there is a happy medium of the [I]absolute minimal 'out' [/I]- if it would really be unfair to kill the PCs with no chance of survival, the GM puts the absolute lightest hand on the tiller in their favour, using something previously foreshadowed - part of the environment, a flaw in the villain's psyche, friendly NPCs, etc. Eg: Fighter PC Conan has fought well against massive odds, but Rexxor the veteran High Priest of Doom has been over-statted - he's several levels higher, has massive DPR, and it's clear that it won't be Rexxor who runs out of hp first. So, a bit of divine intervention, IC and OOC - dead Rogue PC Valeria returns in a split-second vision that stuns Rexxor for a round, giving Conan just the chance he needs to turn the tide. Or, more prosaically, in my own game recently, it was the first encounter for 3 brand new PCs. I turned what was scripted as a safe, illusionary encounter with 3 Pathfinder orcs, into a lethal ambush by 3 very real orcs, on the road just west of a country inn. Only I only had 3 players, not the 4 the module expects, plus Pathfinder orcs are heavily under-CR'd. The PCs fought well, but 2 were down, the last kept going only by his great AC. So I had travellers from the nearby inn hear the noise of battle and come out to assist the last PC - they only arrived in time to scare off the last orc, but it prevented a possible first-encounter TPK that would have been really unfair on the PCs. It was a perfectly plausible event to occur, but AIR I decided it by fiat rather than a probability check or pre-scripting. If that is fudging, to me it falls within acceptable parameters. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Handling Cheating
Top