Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Handling Illusions and Spellcraft
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 2158384" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>The original poster's point is well taken.</p><p></p><p>"Identify a spell being cast. (You must see or hear the spell’s verbal or somatic components.)"</p><p></p><p>"A character faced with proof that an illusion isn’t real needs no saving throw."</p><p></p><p>NPC Wizard casts an Illusionary Wall.</p><p></p><p>PC Cleric only has to hear him doing that, or see him doing that. So, even if the Wizard is invisible, it is a little tougher to pull this off (and yes, he could make it Silent as well, but that takes a feat and a higher level spell and special spell prep for most Wizards).</p><p></p><p>PC Cleric states that it is an illusion and swings his mace through it. All of the rest of the PCs automatically save.</p><p></p><p>Plus, there are usually multiple PCs that have SpellCraft in many groups, so the chances of pulling off an in-combat illusion is even less.</p><p></p><p>The bottom line is that SpellCraft tends to often invalidate in-combat illusions. A skill that is more potent than a significant portion of an entire school of spells. Hmmmm.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I think the only way around this is to have the NPC Wizard not cast Illusion spells in combat too often. Illusions would become the domain of out of combat, long range, under special prep, etc.</p><p></p><p>An interesting house rule would be to have opposed SpellCraft rolls (the caster of the spell has to use up a move action to accomplish this) in order to fake out opposing spell casters from knowing what the real spell is. If he wins the opposed roll and his opponents make a normal SpellCraft check, they think he cast a real Wall of Stone as opposed to the Illusionary one. If he loses the roll and his opponents make a normal SpellCraft check, they think he cast an Illusionary Wall of Stone.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Btw, in my game, characters have to make a Listen roll for any spell cast beyond 30 feet in combat (or other noisy conditions) and beyond 60 feet in relatively quiet conditions unless they can clearly see the caster. If they can see him, they can make a Spot roll beyond 30 feet instead (or both rolls is they can both see and hear him). Any caster in an unobstructed line within 30 feet does not require any Listen/Spot rolls. The DC is 10 plus 1 per 5 feet beyond the minimum plus 1 per opponent in a straight line between them and the caster. So, 2 opponents between the PC and the caster 50 feet away is DC 16. If the PC makes either roll (if he can both see and hear), he then can make his normal SpellCraft roll.</p><p></p><p>Course, enemy casters can do things like stick their head over a wall and then the PCs do not get a Spot roll (not being able to see the somatic components), just a Listen roll.</p><p></p><p>So in answer to the original poster's question, forcing your PCs (and NPCs) to make Listen/Spot rolls to hear/see the casting before making a SpellCraft roll can make illusions a little more useful in combat. It's hard to make your SpellCraft roll is you do not even get to roll it. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 2158384, member: 2011"] The original poster's point is well taken. "Identify a spell being cast. (You must see or hear the spell’s verbal or somatic components.)" "A character faced with proof that an illusion isn’t real needs no saving throw." NPC Wizard casts an Illusionary Wall. PC Cleric only has to hear him doing that, or see him doing that. So, even if the Wizard is invisible, it is a little tougher to pull this off (and yes, he could make it Silent as well, but that takes a feat and a higher level spell and special spell prep for most Wizards). PC Cleric states that it is an illusion and swings his mace through it. All of the rest of the PCs automatically save. Plus, there are usually multiple PCs that have SpellCraft in many groups, so the chances of pulling off an in-combat illusion is even less. The bottom line is that SpellCraft tends to often invalidate in-combat illusions. A skill that is more potent than a significant portion of an entire school of spells. Hmmmm. I think the only way around this is to have the NPC Wizard not cast Illusion spells in combat too often. Illusions would become the domain of out of combat, long range, under special prep, etc. An interesting house rule would be to have opposed SpellCraft rolls (the caster of the spell has to use up a move action to accomplish this) in order to fake out opposing spell casters from knowing what the real spell is. If he wins the opposed roll and his opponents make a normal SpellCraft check, they think he cast a real Wall of Stone as opposed to the Illusionary one. If he loses the roll and his opponents make a normal SpellCraft check, they think he cast an Illusionary Wall of Stone. Btw, in my game, characters have to make a Listen roll for any spell cast beyond 30 feet in combat (or other noisy conditions) and beyond 60 feet in relatively quiet conditions unless they can clearly see the caster. If they can see him, they can make a Spot roll beyond 30 feet instead (or both rolls is they can both see and hear him). Any caster in an unobstructed line within 30 feet does not require any Listen/Spot rolls. The DC is 10 plus 1 per 5 feet beyond the minimum plus 1 per opponent in a straight line between them and the caster. So, 2 opponents between the PC and the caster 50 feet away is DC 16. If the PC makes either roll (if he can both see and hear), he then can make his normal SpellCraft roll. Course, enemy casters can do things like stick their head over a wall and then the PCs do not get a Spot roll (not being able to see the somatic components), just a Listen roll. So in answer to the original poster's question, forcing your PCs (and NPCs) to make Listen/Spot rolls to hear/see the casting before making a SpellCraft roll can make illusions a little more useful in combat. It's hard to make your SpellCraft roll is you do not even get to roll it. ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Handling Illusions and Spellcraft
Top