Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Harassment in gaming
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sunshadow21" data-source="post: 6875501" data-attributes="member: 6667193"><p>That's not fine with me. Most of the people I find most irritating when this topic comes up are those that are screaming that loudest about what others should be doing in the name of "inclusiveness" while completely ignoring the fact that they are in fact being just as non-inclusive as those they are attacking by not being willing to even tolerate the presence of the opposing viewpoint. The original article that sparked all of this is a prime example of that to me; I get that there are problems in our hobby that need be fixed, but I have a hard time believing that anyone who coins the term "white male terrorism " is genuinely serious about starting anything close to a meaningful dialogue in hopes of eventually reaching a solution acceptable to everyone. The whole tone of that article is very much "burn the infidels" and a rallying cry for the army of would be social justice warriors (and yes, I use that term deliberately to fully mean everything that tends to get attached to it, because that very much seems to be the target audience for that article) to gather together and force everyone to accept the author's solutions without question or hesitation. People in this thread have talked about presentation, and that word matters a great deal in regards to this thread and that article. I have no problem acknowledging that more can be done and that more conversation can be had, but articles like that are the last thing this conversation needs. It simply adds more negativity and hostility to a conversation that is already extremely negative and hostile while driving away all the people in the middle that are simply tired of the idiot extremists on both sides. </p><p></p><p>The related article on Enworld itself did a far better job of highlighting the problem while leaving room for actual constructive discussion, and that does seem to have occurred to at least some degree, but for me at least, the vast majority of the constructive conversation has been heavily drowned out. I haven't been able to read more than half a dozen posts at a time simply because too many people are either trying to bludgeon their opponents out of the thread and/or simply aren't listening and are talking right past each other. In the end, I am left agreeing that more conversation needs to be had, but if this is the best conversation that we can muster, the people who are tired of the topic and see no point in discussing it further may well have a legitimate point. There's only so much ranting and raving I can listen to before it all becomes background noise.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sunshadow21, post: 6875501, member: 6667193"] That's not fine with me. Most of the people I find most irritating when this topic comes up are those that are screaming that loudest about what others should be doing in the name of "inclusiveness" while completely ignoring the fact that they are in fact being just as non-inclusive as those they are attacking by not being willing to even tolerate the presence of the opposing viewpoint. The original article that sparked all of this is a prime example of that to me; I get that there are problems in our hobby that need be fixed, but I have a hard time believing that anyone who coins the term "white male terrorism " is genuinely serious about starting anything close to a meaningful dialogue in hopes of eventually reaching a solution acceptable to everyone. The whole tone of that article is very much "burn the infidels" and a rallying cry for the army of would be social justice warriors (and yes, I use that term deliberately to fully mean everything that tends to get attached to it, because that very much seems to be the target audience for that article) to gather together and force everyone to accept the author's solutions without question or hesitation. People in this thread have talked about presentation, and that word matters a great deal in regards to this thread and that article. I have no problem acknowledging that more can be done and that more conversation can be had, but articles like that are the last thing this conversation needs. It simply adds more negativity and hostility to a conversation that is already extremely negative and hostile while driving away all the people in the middle that are simply tired of the idiot extremists on both sides. The related article on Enworld itself did a far better job of highlighting the problem while leaving room for actual constructive discussion, and that does seem to have occurred to at least some degree, but for me at least, the vast majority of the constructive conversation has been heavily drowned out. I haven't been able to read more than half a dozen posts at a time simply because too many people are either trying to bludgeon their opponents out of the thread and/or simply aren't listening and are talking right past each other. In the end, I am left agreeing that more conversation needs to be had, but if this is the best conversation that we can muster, the people who are tired of the topic and see no point in discussing it further may well have a legitimate point. There's only so much ranting and raving I can listen to before it all becomes background noise. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Harassment in gaming
Top