Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Umbran" data-source="post: 6883202" data-attributes="member: 177">As one has noted, they are not the same in the modern military.&nbsp; Nor are they so in modern business, in which communications plans are frequently based on a &quot;RACI chart&quot;, which denotes who is Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, or Informed on project status.The real point is that there are, in fact, two concepts - the people who are guilty, and the people who are tasked with making things better, and these are very often not the same people.&nbsp; The business world and the military have gotten on board with there being two concepts.&nbsp; I suggest we join them, because they have great value here.I think you are incorrect there.&quot;A terroristic threat is a threat to commit a crime of violence or a threat to cause bodily injury to another person and terrorization as the result of the proscribed conduct.&quot;<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terroristic_threat" target="_blank">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terroristic_threat</a>So, say a female game developer is being harrassed, and gets doxxed, and someone threatens to go to her house and do violence to her.&nbsp; If that person were to follow through on that act, even though it is performed on a single individual, would result in fear and intimidation among many other female game developers, and other women by extension.&nbsp; That act, even though carried out on an individual, has broader implications, and thus counts as terrorism.Terrorism is not defined by the number of people you do violence to, but the number of people you intimidate.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Umbran, post: 6883202, member: 177"] As one has noted, they are not the same in the modern military. Nor are they so in modern business, in which communications plans are frequently based on a "RACI chart", which denotes who is Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, or Informed on project status. The real point is that [i]there are, in fact, two concepts - the people who are guilty, and the people who are tasked with making things better[/i], and these are very often not the same people. The business world and the military have gotten on board with there being two concepts. I suggest we join them, because they have great value here. I think you are incorrect there. "A terroristic threat is a threat to commit a crime of violence or a threat to cause bodily injury to another person and terrorization as the result of the proscribed conduct." [url]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terroristic_threat[/url] So, say a female game developer is being harrassed, and gets doxxed, and someone threatens to go to her house and do violence to her. If that person were to follow through on that act, even though it is performed on a single individual, would result in fear and intimidation among many other female game developers, and other women by extension. That act, even though carried out on an individual, has broader implications, and thus counts as terrorism. Terrorism is not defined by the number of people you do violence to, but the number of people you intimidate. [/QUOTE]

Verification