Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="MechaPilot" data-source="post: 7010430" data-attributes="member: 82779">Agreed.&nbsp; More monsters alone won't be enough to draw me in.&nbsp; I'd expect them to be of high quality, and to be very active participants.I agree.&nbsp; I found I've had to modify monsters, giving them more abilities, to make them what I feel they should be.&nbsp; I had to add a rend-armor* ability to dragons to get them to properly reflect dragons in my setting.*If the dragon hits a creature wearing heavy armor with its bite or claws the dragon damages the armor.&nbsp; A creature wearing damaged heavy armor grants advantage on all attack rolls against them until the armor is repaired.A list of revised CRs for the monsters in the original MM.&nbsp; Some of them certainly don't stack up to the CRs they've been given.Better guidance for giving monsters PC class levels, or for just giving them PC subclass features.Monstrous Compendium (since nostalgia and rehashing old names is such a big thing these days).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="MechaPilot, post: 7010430, member: 82779"] Agreed. More monsters alone won't be enough to draw me in. I'd expect them to be of high quality, and to be very active participants. I agree. I found I've had to modify monsters, giving them more abilities, to make them what I feel they should be. I had to add a rend-armor* ability to dragons to get them to properly reflect dragons in my setting. *If the dragon hits a creature wearing heavy armor with its bite or claws the dragon damages the armor. A creature wearing damaged heavy armor grants advantage on all attack rolls against them until the armor is repaired. A list of revised CRs for the monsters in the original MM. Some of them certainly don't stack up to the CRs they've been given. Better guidance for giving monsters PC class levels, or for just giving them PC subclass features. Monstrous Compendium (since nostalgia and rehashing old names is such a big thing these days). [/QUOTE]

Verification