Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Harm Changes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Serge" data-source="post: 326014" data-attributes="member: 4049"><p>We play it the way it's described in the PH.</p><p></p><p>Fact of the matter is, as a DM, I know of countless methods and means to kill off all players at any time. I'm not worried about players having the ability to walk up and possibly kill an NPC, even a BBEG (who, in most cases, isn't who my players think s/he is). And what's good for the goose is good for the gander. If PCs know about <em>harm</em> and its benefits, it's a certainty that some of their more powerful and wise opponents do as well. </p><p></p><p>No offense, but I think a lot of people (not necessarily those on this thread) are overreacting to the spell. More intelligent creatures/adversaries will take the necessarily precautions against this and other similarly powerful spells. </p><p></p><p>IMC, the one cleric has used <em>harm</em> a total of two times, although he had access to the spell for months. Heck, not only did he have access to it, he also had the Reach Spell Feat from <em>Defenders of the Faith</em> which allows all touch spells prepared at two levels higher to function as 20 foot ranged touch spells. The first time he used it, it was against a very nasty, slightly higher level Priestess. It hit, reduced her to 2 hp, and she healed herself the next round because all attempts to hit her missed (and the Wizard rolled too low on his Initiative to blast her will a <em>magic missile</em>. The second time it was used was against an Ancient Green Dragon. Again, he had used the Reach version, broke the SR, and reduced the Dragon to 1 hp. The cleric, benefiting from a <em>mass haste</em> spell, followed up with a <em>searing light</em> spell and did not break the SR. A dwarf (with boots of flying) swung and missed. The next round, everyone rolled abyssmal Initiatives (I require new Ini every round) and the Dragon <em>teleported</em> away. Not once has the <em>harm</em> spell as worded hindered me. On the other hand, it's been used twice against the PCs to devastating effect.</p><p></p><p>I don't see what the gripe is about this spell. Please, someone enlighten me as to why it seems so overpowered when it's worked fine for me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Serge, post: 326014, member: 4049"] We play it the way it's described in the PH. Fact of the matter is, as a DM, I know of countless methods and means to kill off all players at any time. I'm not worried about players having the ability to walk up and possibly kill an NPC, even a BBEG (who, in most cases, isn't who my players think s/he is). And what's good for the goose is good for the gander. If PCs know about [i]harm[/i] and its benefits, it's a certainty that some of their more powerful and wise opponents do as well. No offense, but I think a lot of people (not necessarily those on this thread) are overreacting to the spell. More intelligent creatures/adversaries will take the necessarily precautions against this and other similarly powerful spells. IMC, the one cleric has used [i]harm[/i] a total of two times, although he had access to the spell for months. Heck, not only did he have access to it, he also had the Reach Spell Feat from [i]Defenders of the Faith[/i] which allows all touch spells prepared at two levels higher to function as 20 foot ranged touch spells. The first time he used it, it was against a very nasty, slightly higher level Priestess. It hit, reduced her to 2 hp, and she healed herself the next round because all attempts to hit her missed (and the Wizard rolled too low on his Initiative to blast her will a [i]magic missile[/i]. The second time it was used was against an Ancient Green Dragon. Again, he had used the Reach version, broke the SR, and reduced the Dragon to 1 hp. The cleric, benefiting from a [i]mass haste[/i] spell, followed up with a [i]searing light[/i] spell and did not break the SR. A dwarf (with boots of flying) swung and missed. The next round, everyone rolled abyssmal Initiatives (I require new Ini every round) and the Dragon [i]teleported[/i] away. Not once has the [i]harm[/i] spell as worded hindered me. On the other hand, it's been used twice against the PCs to devastating effect. I don't see what the gripe is about this spell. Please, someone enlighten me as to why it seems so overpowered when it's worked fine for me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Harm Changes
Top