Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="HellHound" data-source="post: 264431" data-attributes="member: 3397">Patrick & KK;The "writing level" debate about Harn is ridiculous. I have been trying to stay out of this debate, but I *have* to throw in my 5 coppers here.I read each and every Harn supplement as it was released, starting with the old boxed set and through the Encyclopedia Harnicas and so on. I stopped about... 8 or 9 years ago I guess - basically when I stopped running my OD&D Harn campaign.Now, I hear that to have read and understood these books I should have had a college education and been above the 13-14 age line that D&D is supposedly written for.Let's see... I *STOPPED* reading the Harn materials when I turned 21. I understood them all. I enjoyed them. I generally consider myself fairly dense, placing my INT in D&D terms at around an 8 or 9. I have no college or university education. I am a steelworker by trade.I didn't need a dictionary, thesaurus or encyclopedia to explain the texts to me. Unless someone went through and recently re-wrote the Harn materials in the past 10 years to be truly arcane texts, your arguments are BUNK. Edited: oops! embarrassing typo!</blockquote>