Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Harry Potter-Style Wizards
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="trav_laney" data-source="post: 3278100" data-attributes="member: 46508"><p>My wife is a huge Harry Potter fan, and she likes to watch the movies over and over again in sequence. Which means, <em>I also watch the movies over and over again in sequence.</em> I'm not saying the movies are bad, but...well, you know.</p><p></p><p>Anyway. I don't know if anyone else has this problem or not, but everytime I watch a movie (especially fantasy fiction), I start reducing everything down to D20 mechanics. The question on the table is:</p><p></p><p>If you were to develop a wizard class variant for the D20 system, based on J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter" series of books, what changes would you make and why?</p><p></p><p>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - </p><p></p><p>Here's my thoughts.</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>The Wizard's Wand:</strong> According to J.K. Rowling, a wizard cannot cast a spell unless he has a wand. This wand is supposed to be attuned to the wizard ("The wand chooses the wizard," the clerk at Flourish and Blots said,) but it is possible to use another wizard's wand in place of your own (example: Gilderoy Lockhart using Ron's damaged wand in "Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets.") And Hagrid used an umbrella instead of a wand to start a fire and to curse Dudley Dursley with a pig's tail.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: DarkGreen"><em><strong>D20 Interpretation:</strong> all wizard spells have a Focus requirement for casting. This focus is always the wizard's own wand, which is specially attuned to the wizard. It is possible to use another wizard's wand, but requres a Spellcraft check DC 20 to avoid backfire. It is possible to use an improvised wand (with a penalty to the Spellcraft check) from any item vaguely the same size and shape as a wand (such as an umbrella). A new wand costs 100 gp.</em></span></p><p></p><p><strong>Material Components:</strong> No wizards in the world of Harry Potter use material components for casting spells...at least, not yet (there is still another boook out there, ya know.) All spells appear to have verbal and somatic components ("Swish, then flick!" / "A-LO-ha-MOR-ah!"), and they all seem to require the afforementioned wand, but nobody mixes bat guano or grasshopper legs into their incantations.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: DarkGreen"><em><strong>D20 Interpretation:</strong> all spells have a focus requirement, plus any V or S components that are listed in the spell description. Arcane spells have no material components whatsoever.</em></span></p><p></p><p><strong>Houses:</strong> The wizards from Slytherin are obviously the "bad guys," and the wizards from Gryffindor are obviously the "good guys." Little is known about Ravenclaw or Hufflepuff, except that they seem to have little interest in the affairs of Voldemort. But if you dig deep enough into the books, you will find that Gryffindor favors courage, Ravenclaw favors intellect, Hufflepuff favors hard work and fairness, and Slytherin favors cunning.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: DarkGreen"><em><strong>D20 Interpretation: </strong> wizards are separated into their Houses by alignment:</em></span></p><p><span style="color: DarkGreen"><em>Good: Gryffindor</em></span></p><p><span style="color: DarkGreen"><em>Evil, Chaotic: Slytherin</em></span></p><p><span style="color: DarkGreen"><em>Lawful: Hufflepuff</em></span></p><p><span style="color: DarkGreen"><em>Neutral: Ravenclaw</em></span></p><p><span style="color: DarkGreen"></span></p><p><span style="color: DarkGreen">A wizard's House doesn't seem to have much of a bearing on the story, except that unless a character is in the Gryffindor or Slytherin houses, he/she will most often be ignored.</span></p><p></p><p><strong>Familiars: </strong> In "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone," Harry is told that students who apply to Hogwart's School of Witchcraft and Wizardry may bring one of the following animals: a cat, a frog, a rat, or an owl. We have yet to see a wizard walking around with a bat, hawk, lizard, raven, snake, or weasel.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: DarkGreen"><em><strong>D20 Interpretation:</strong> all familiars must be cats, frogs, rats, or owls. All of them appear to suck, badly.</em></span></p><p></p><p><strong>Parseltongue: </strong> some of the characters in J.K. Rowling's books (notably, Voldemort and Harry Potter) can talk to snakes.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: DarkGreen"><em><strong>D20 Interpretation:</strong> this would be best handled with a feat:</em></span></p><p><span style="color: DarkGreen"><em></em></span></p><p><span style="color: DarkGreen"><em><strong>Parseltongue (General)</strong></em></span></p><p><span style="color: DarkGreen"><em>You are born with the rare gift of being able to talk to snakes.</em></span></p><p><span style="color: DarkGreen"><em>Effect: you may converse with snakes (only) as if under the effects of a permanent speak with animals spell.</em></span></p><p></p><p></p><p>What else? Come on, help me out. It's fun. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="trav_laney, post: 3278100, member: 46508"] My wife is a huge Harry Potter fan, and she likes to watch the movies over and over again in sequence. Which means, [I]I also watch the movies over and over again in sequence.[/I] I'm not saying the movies are bad, but...well, you know. Anyway. I don't know if anyone else has this problem or not, but everytime I watch a movie (especially fantasy fiction), I start reducing everything down to D20 mechanics. The question on the table is: If you were to develop a wizard class variant for the D20 system, based on J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter" series of books, what changes would you make and why? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Here's my thoughts. [B]The Wizard's Wand:[/B] According to J.K. Rowling, a wizard cannot cast a spell unless he has a wand. This wand is supposed to be attuned to the wizard ("The wand chooses the wizard," the clerk at Flourish and Blots said,) but it is possible to use another wizard's wand in place of your own (example: Gilderoy Lockhart using Ron's damaged wand in "Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets.") And Hagrid used an umbrella instead of a wand to start a fire and to curse Dudley Dursley with a pig's tail. [COLOR=DarkGreen][I][B]D20 Interpretation:[/B] all wizard spells have a Focus requirement for casting. This focus is always the wizard's own wand, which is specially attuned to the wizard. It is possible to use another wizard's wand, but requres a Spellcraft check DC 20 to avoid backfire. It is possible to use an improvised wand (with a penalty to the Spellcraft check) from any item vaguely the same size and shape as a wand (such as an umbrella). A new wand costs 100 gp.[/I][/COLOR] [B]Material Components:[/B] No wizards in the world of Harry Potter use material components for casting spells...at least, not yet (there is still another boook out there, ya know.) All spells appear to have verbal and somatic components ("Swish, then flick!" / "A-LO-ha-MOR-ah!"), and they all seem to require the afforementioned wand, but nobody mixes bat guano or grasshopper legs into their incantations. [COLOR=DarkGreen][I][B]D20 Interpretation:[/B] all spells have a focus requirement, plus any V or S components that are listed in the spell description. Arcane spells have no material components whatsoever.[/I][/COLOR] [B]Houses:[/B] The wizards from Slytherin are obviously the "bad guys," and the wizards from Gryffindor are obviously the "good guys." Little is known about Ravenclaw or Hufflepuff, except that they seem to have little interest in the affairs of Voldemort. But if you dig deep enough into the books, you will find that Gryffindor favors courage, Ravenclaw favors intellect, Hufflepuff favors hard work and fairness, and Slytherin favors cunning. [COLOR=DarkGreen][I][B]D20 Interpretation: [/B] wizards are separated into their Houses by alignment: Good: Gryffindor Evil, Chaotic: Slytherin Lawful: Hufflepuff Neutral: Ravenclaw[/I] A wizard's House doesn't seem to have much of a bearing on the story, except that unless a character is in the Gryffindor or Slytherin houses, he/she will most often be ignored.[/COLOR] [B]Familiars: [/B] In "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone," Harry is told that students who apply to Hogwart's School of Witchcraft and Wizardry may bring one of the following animals: a cat, a frog, a rat, or an owl. We have yet to see a wizard walking around with a bat, hawk, lizard, raven, snake, or weasel. [COLOR=DarkGreen][I][B]D20 Interpretation:[/B] all familiars must be cats, frogs, rats, or owls. All of them appear to suck, badly.[/I][/COLOR] [B]Parseltongue: [/B] some of the characters in J.K. Rowling's books (notably, Voldemort and Harry Potter) can talk to snakes. [COLOR=DarkGreen][I][B]D20 Interpretation:[/B] this would be best handled with a feat: [B]Parseltongue (General)[/B] You are born with the rare gift of being able to talk to snakes. Effect: you may converse with snakes (only) as if under the effects of a permanent speak with animals spell.[/I][/COLOR] What else? Come on, help me out. It's fun. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Harry Potter-Style Wizards
Top