Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Harry Potter-Style Wizards
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Spatzimaus" data-source="post: 3284545" data-attributes="member: 3051"><p>I've actually used the Harry Potter wand system as one of the inspirations for the hybrid Wizard/Cleric class in my homebrew.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Alternate Interpretation #1:</p><p><strong>Cantrips don't require a wand at all.</strong> This is one I used for our system, although with a Feat we allowed the Wizard to do the same for his "Domain" spells. Most of the things Harry did without a wand could be explained through use of Mage Hand, Light, etc. A "disarmed" wizard wouldn't be completely helpless, but close to it.</p><p></p><p>Alternate Interpretation #2:</p><p><strong>Wands are a substitute for Material Components, and vice versa.</strong> We also use this one.</p><p>After all, the books contain quite a few examples of non-wand magic: Potions, the Centaurs' prophecies, etc. Effectively, Wands and Component Pouches could fill the same niche; it's much easier to have to keep track of a single focus item, but it's not a necessity.</p><p>This also explains all the material components seen in the books. If you're working in a medical ward, it's much easier to keep the three or four common materials used for healing spells on hand than to keep pulling out your wand. Also remember that they're at a school; at home, few wizards would have materials for anything other than the most commonly-used spells (floo powder?), and so would rely on their wands for everything, but at a place like Hogwart's, they'd have all sorts of rare materials on hand.</p><p></p><p>Alternate Interpretation #3:</p><p><strong>Without a Wand, a Wizard must make a Spellcraft roll to see if he gets the effect he wanted out of the spell, with the DC scaling with spell level.</strong> In the books, we don't normally see the high-level wizards trying to cast "low-level" spells, so we don't know if wands are strictly necessary for those.</p><p></p><p>Alternate Interpretation #4:</p><p><strong>A Wizard can expend something to cast spells without a Wand.</strong> You could have it cost HP, which'd explain why it doesn't get done often. Or, you could take a page from the Psionics rules and have it expend the equivalent of "Psionic Focus", which is why it only happened when Harry got angry, and why he didn't do it repeatedly.</p><p></p><p>But as others have said, we've seen a single type of magic, from a single school, whose students come from a small geographical area. It could just be an affectation among one small sample of wizards.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Spatzimaus, post: 3284545, member: 3051"] I've actually used the Harry Potter wand system as one of the inspirations for the hybrid Wizard/Cleric class in my homebrew. Alternate Interpretation #1: [b]Cantrips don't require a wand at all.[/b] This is one I used for our system, although with a Feat we allowed the Wizard to do the same for his "Domain" spells. Most of the things Harry did without a wand could be explained through use of Mage Hand, Light, etc. A "disarmed" wizard wouldn't be completely helpless, but close to it. Alternate Interpretation #2: [b]Wands are a substitute for Material Components, and vice versa.[/b] We also use this one. After all, the books contain quite a few examples of non-wand magic: Potions, the Centaurs' prophecies, etc. Effectively, Wands and Component Pouches could fill the same niche; it's much easier to have to keep track of a single focus item, but it's not a necessity. This also explains all the material components seen in the books. If you're working in a medical ward, it's much easier to keep the three or four common materials used for healing spells on hand than to keep pulling out your wand. Also remember that they're at a school; at home, few wizards would have materials for anything other than the most commonly-used spells (floo powder?), and so would rely on their wands for everything, but at a place like Hogwart's, they'd have all sorts of rare materials on hand. Alternate Interpretation #3: [b]Without a Wand, a Wizard must make a Spellcraft roll to see if he gets the effect he wanted out of the spell, with the DC scaling with spell level.[/b] In the books, we don't normally see the high-level wizards trying to cast "low-level" spells, so we don't know if wands are strictly necessary for those. Alternate Interpretation #4: [b]A Wizard can expend something to cast spells without a Wand.[/b] You could have it cost HP, which'd explain why it doesn't get done often. Or, you could take a page from the Psionics rules and have it expend the equivalent of "Psionic Focus", which is why it only happened when Harry got angry, and why he didn't do it repeatedly. But as others have said, we've seen a single type of magic, from a single school, whose students come from a small geographical area. It could just be an affectation among one small sample of wizards. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Harry Potter-Style Wizards
Top