Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- individual adventure modules! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed to plug in to your game.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Harry Potter & The Deathly Hallows - POTENTIAL SPOILERS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Digital M@" data-source="post: 3655126" data-attributes="member: 13987"><p>Spoiers ahead</p><p></p><p>I thought it was OK. Many things in the story bothered me. Personally, Hemione played too bg of a role, she did everything in the first 3/4 of the books. Ron and Harry night as well have been monkies picking bugs from each others fur. Harry did not practice improving his spell casting abilities, silent casting or anything to better prepare himself for the conflict he knew was coming. I fugured rage and fear would have been motivation enough.</p><p></p><p>We read the same backround information about Dumbledore 4 times in the book, each time with a different flair, but really it was all the same info and IMO was not that interesting. What bothered me the most is that is brought angry brooding Harry back.</p><p></p><p>There was lots of conflict, but not enough suspence, but that may be because I read the book in one sitting. I will re-ead it in a month or so over a lnger period of time and I may digest it differently.</p><p></p><p>I was also bothered by Harry ending up unconcious after each combat sequence, it became overused and predictable. The accidental Horcrux was a really bad story line (IMO), I just did not want to see it in the story, I did not feel it was going to add any dimension to the characters or the book and it seemed forced. I also did not understand why Harry toght he could not share info on the Horcrux once V knew Harry was destroying them. That annoyed me. The sword in the hat was annoying only because the Goblin tanking the sword was such a big deal. Harry had conversation about deals with Goblins, the 3 main characters discussed it, the goblin betrays Harry before harry can betray him. In the end none of that made any difference and it did not make for a richer story.</p><p></p><p>Overall the book did not flow as well as some of the others, characters seemed kind of flat, and I was not immersed into the non acion story like I was in HBP.</p><p></p><p>Honestly, the pace and direction of the book went a much different direction than I thought and that could be coloring my opinion. I did like how the sequence at Hogwarts went. I like the buildup of supporters, the multi-faceted battle, V's understanding and exploitation of Harry's weaknesses. Albus's brother was a great new character, the mystery of where help was coming was well done, Severus's back story was good, but I would of liked to see him have a more active/sacradicial death, he was such a good character, I mean you knew he was a good guy but you still hated him, but liked him deep down inside.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Digital M@, post: 3655126, member: 13987"] Spoiers ahead I thought it was OK. Many things in the story bothered me. Personally, Hemione played too bg of a role, she did everything in the first 3/4 of the books. Ron and Harry night as well have been monkies picking bugs from each others fur. Harry did not practice improving his spell casting abilities, silent casting or anything to better prepare himself for the conflict he knew was coming. I fugured rage and fear would have been motivation enough. We read the same backround information about Dumbledore 4 times in the book, each time with a different flair, but really it was all the same info and IMO was not that interesting. What bothered me the most is that is brought angry brooding Harry back. There was lots of conflict, but not enough suspence, but that may be because I read the book in one sitting. I will re-ead it in a month or so over a lnger period of time and I may digest it differently. I was also bothered by Harry ending up unconcious after each combat sequence, it became overused and predictable. The accidental Horcrux was a really bad story line (IMO), I just did not want to see it in the story, I did not feel it was going to add any dimension to the characters or the book and it seemed forced. I also did not understand why Harry toght he could not share info on the Horcrux once V knew Harry was destroying them. That annoyed me. The sword in the hat was annoying only because the Goblin tanking the sword was such a big deal. Harry had conversation about deals with Goblins, the 3 main characters discussed it, the goblin betrays Harry before harry can betray him. In the end none of that made any difference and it did not make for a richer story. Overall the book did not flow as well as some of the others, characters seemed kind of flat, and I was not immersed into the non acion story like I was in HBP. Honestly, the pace and direction of the book went a much different direction than I thought and that could be coloring my opinion. I did like how the sequence at Hogwarts went. I like the buildup of supporters, the multi-faceted battle, V's understanding and exploitation of Harry's weaknesses. Albus's brother was a great new character, the mystery of where help was coming was well done, Severus's back story was good, but I would of liked to see him have a more active/sacradicial death, he was such a good character, I mean you knew he was a good guy but you still hated him, but liked him deep down inside. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Harry Potter & The Deathly Hallows - POTENTIAL SPOILERS
Top