Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="nobodez" data-source="post: 3656423" data-attributes="member: 3970">I can't believe I'm the only one that sees this.The Epilogue is titles &quot;19 years later&quot;, yet, Ted, who was born in 1998, would be 19 years old, two years too old to be snogging Victoire in the back of the train.IF it was 16 years later, I could understand, even 17 years later, with Ted coming to Hogwarts a bit later, but not 19, that's just too old for Ted to be on the Train and still attending Hogwarts.But, aside from that, I'm glad that Snape was vindicated, I'm sad that the characters were too stupid to see what was right in front of them most of the time, and I'm really tempted to get a tattoo that can be described as thus:At least, I think that's the right description.Yep, just checked Chapter 21, and that's the one. It would have been nice for JK to describe the symbol like that, rather than just having a vague description of a &quot;symbol&quot;.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="nobodez, post: 3656423, member: 3970"] I can't believe I'm the only one that sees this. The Epilogue is titles "19 years later", yet, Ted, who was born in 1998, would be 19 years old, two years too old to be snogging Victoire in the back of the train. IF it was 16 years later, I could understand, even 17 years later, with Ted coming to Hogwarts a bit later, but not 19, that's just too old for Ted to be on the Train and still attending Hogwarts. But, aside from that, I'm glad that Snape was vindicated, I'm sad that the characters were too stupid to see what was right in front of them most of the time, and I'm really tempted to get a tattoo that can be described as thus: At least, I think that's the right description. Yep, just checked Chapter 21, and that's the one. It would have been nice for JK to describe the symbol like that, rather than just having a vague description of a "symbol". [/QUOTE]

Verification