Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Treebore" data-source="post: 3345272" data-attributes="member: 10177">Blackwind,Nope. This is what I am looking for. There were certain extra books in 2E I really liked, like all the ones about Specialty Priests.I did like elements of a lot of the books you mentioned, I just never found myself re-reading them just for the heck of it. Or I don't remember doing it. This is over 6 years ago now, and my brain is definitely acting older (forgetful).By and large I don't like most of the new books. Adventures are what I like to reread the most.But I do find myself re-reading Libris Mortis, Book of 9 Swords, UA, and parts of the Complete books. PH2 and DMG2 have been books my kids have liked much more than I.Generally I don't reread the stuff for the rules, at least not as written. Book of 9 Swords I like because the &quot;idea&quot; is pretty darn cool. I'm just not a fan of their ideas on how to implement it. So when I reread it I am also trying to think of ways to implement in a manner I would like. So, no, I am not in any way offended by your post. It is very much the kind of feedback I am looking for.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Treebore, post: 3345272, member: 10177"] Blackwind, Nope. This is what I am looking for. There were certain extra books in 2E I really liked, like all the ones about Specialty Priests. I did like elements of a lot of the books you mentioned, I just never found myself re-reading them just for the heck of it. Or I don't remember doing it. This is over 6 years ago now, and my brain is definitely acting older (forgetful). By and large I don't like most of the new books. Adventures are what I like to reread the most. But I do find myself re-reading Libris Mortis, Book of 9 Swords, UA, and parts of the Complete books. PH2 and DMG2 have been books my kids have liked much more than I. Generally I don't reread the stuff for the rules, at least not as written. Book of 9 Swords I like because the "idea" is pretty darn cool. I'm just not a fan of their ideas on how to implement it. So when I reread it I am also trying to think of ways to implement in a manner I would like. So, no, I am not in any way offended by your post. It is very much the kind of feedback I am looking for. [/QUOTE]

Verification