Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Has D&D jumped the shark?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Psion" data-source="post: 2350997" data-attributes="member: 172"><p>I think I heard either or both Keith Strohm and/or Ryan Dancey mention that in regards to why wizards really cut back on the additional properties. I think from the horses mouth is a pretty strong indication.</p><p></p><p>Not saying they couldn't be wrong. But it makes sense. According to one line manager (I forget which -- this was the late 2e days) they wouldn't put out new lines unless they thought it would sell more than 5000 copies. I think WotC's standards are a step higher than that. Which is why anyone who is really counting will note that there are fewer products per month now than then. Any given product has development costs and other one-time costs associated with it, in addition to a higher per unit printing cost, which means that they get less profit if they split their sales among multiple lines.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Perhaps they beleive that people will only invest in one of two of their core settings, regardless of how many they have out. Considering how much market research they reportedly do, they would probably be in a better position to make such a determination. Any second guessing we do may be rather uninformed.</p><p></p><p>But somehow, you give the poster a messageboard, he becomes a market expert who knows better than people whose livelihood depend on this who do have the facts. So while I am not saying they couldn't be wrong, I do tend to beleive they are in a better position to know than an arbitrary fan.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Psion, post: 2350997, member: 172"] I think I heard either or both Keith Strohm and/or Ryan Dancey mention that in regards to why wizards really cut back on the additional properties. I think from the horses mouth is a pretty strong indication. Not saying they couldn't be wrong. But it makes sense. According to one line manager (I forget which -- this was the late 2e days) they wouldn't put out new lines unless they thought it would sell more than 5000 copies. I think WotC's standards are a step higher than that. Which is why anyone who is really counting will note that there are fewer products per month now than then. Any given product has development costs and other one-time costs associated with it, in addition to a higher per unit printing cost, which means that they get less profit if they split their sales among multiple lines. Perhaps they beleive that people will only invest in one of two of their core settings, regardless of how many they have out. Considering how much market research they reportedly do, they would probably be in a better position to make such a determination. Any second guessing we do may be rather uninformed. But somehow, you give the poster a messageboard, he becomes a market expert who knows better than people whose livelihood depend on this who do have the facts. So while I am not saying they couldn't be wrong, I do tend to beleive they are in a better position to know than an arbitrary fan. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Has D&D jumped the shark?
Top