Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Has Monte Cook made 4th ed Unnecessary?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Stalker0" data-source="post: 4085725" data-attributes="member: 5889"><p>This is actually a good question. We all know that WOTC makes most of its dnd money off of the core books. While that's not the only way to go, apparently its been more profitable than doing adventurers and things of that nature.</p><p></p><p>They need to continue to make money, so they need to sell more books. Supplements often sell well, but also have the problem of increasing rules bloat. There comes a tipping point when either you continue to push the system with supplements or try to push for a new set of core books.</p><p></p><p>In other words 4e.</p><p></p><p>Now people will scream that that's a bad thing, but its not. Competition breeds excellence. The designers at WOTC know they have to make a good system to compete with their already good one. And let's face it, we gamers are downright demanding. We pay a paltry fee for our hobby (and yes, $200 every few months are so is paltry compared to many hobbies, try model airplanes, or Warhammer 40K) and we absolutely demand perfection.</p><p></p><p>Hopefully 4e will bring us some of that perfection.</p><p></p><p>But the question I quoted in the beginning is a very important point. For dnd (as an organized company and not just a bunch of scattered people playing) to survive, new editions are required every so often. In that respect, each new edition is necessary for the good of all.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Stalker0, post: 4085725, member: 5889"] This is actually a good question. We all know that WOTC makes most of its dnd money off of the core books. While that's not the only way to go, apparently its been more profitable than doing adventurers and things of that nature. They need to continue to make money, so they need to sell more books. Supplements often sell well, but also have the problem of increasing rules bloat. There comes a tipping point when either you continue to push the system with supplements or try to push for a new set of core books. In other words 4e. Now people will scream that that's a bad thing, but its not. Competition breeds excellence. The designers at WOTC know they have to make a good system to compete with their already good one. And let's face it, we gamers are downright demanding. We pay a paltry fee for our hobby (and yes, $200 every few months are so is paltry compared to many hobbies, try model airplanes, or Warhammer 40K) and we absolutely demand perfection. Hopefully 4e will bring us some of that perfection. But the question I quoted in the beginning is a very important point. For dnd (as an organized company and not just a bunch of scattered people playing) to survive, new editions are required every so often. In that respect, each new edition is necessary for the good of all. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Has Monte Cook made 4th ed Unnecessary?
Top