Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Has Monte Cook made 4th ed Unnecessary?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tzarevitch" data-source="post: 4086384" data-attributes="member: 1792"><p>The community will support it as always. There will always be grognards but the community will support 4e regardless for one simple reason: market share. As has been posted before, Monte may be the 500lb gorilla but WotC is the Cloverfield monster. . . on steroids with a planet-destroying laser and a hyperdrive. So long as 4e solves many of the problems of 3.xe and is reliably supported by WotC, the market will follow them. Monte simply is not going to be able to produce sufficient material even if he wanted to. It isn't worth buying one-off rules then having to convert everything when WotC produces everything to their new rule set requiring minimal conversion. That is the fact of it. </p><p></p><p>Monte has produced some good stuff but he has also produced some duds. Contrary to popular belief, he does not walk on water, and nd I have yet to see him turn water to wine. His stuff is by and large pretty decent but it does not fix the underlying problems in the 3e system any more than any other publisher including WotC itself. Lastly after you have patched 3e so much is it really even 3e anymore? At some point you've developed a significant enough change that it really is a new system. . . a la a different form of 4e. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> </p><p></p><p>No offense intended, but thinking Monte will hold back the tide is wishful thinking. I don't think he intends to do that and he couldn't if he wanted to.</p><p></p><p>Tzarevitch</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tzarevitch, post: 4086384, member: 1792"] The community will support it as always. There will always be grognards but the community will support 4e regardless for one simple reason: market share. As has been posted before, Monte may be the 500lb gorilla but WotC is the Cloverfield monster. . . on steroids with a planet-destroying laser and a hyperdrive. So long as 4e solves many of the problems of 3.xe and is reliably supported by WotC, the market will follow them. Monte simply is not going to be able to produce sufficient material even if he wanted to. It isn't worth buying one-off rules then having to convert everything when WotC produces everything to their new rule set requiring minimal conversion. That is the fact of it. Monte has produced some good stuff but he has also produced some duds. Contrary to popular belief, he does not walk on water, and nd I have yet to see him turn water to wine. His stuff is by and large pretty decent but it does not fix the underlying problems in the 3e system any more than any other publisher including WotC itself. Lastly after you have patched 3e so much is it really even 3e anymore? At some point you've developed a significant enough change that it really is a new system. . . a la a different form of 4e. :) No offense intended, but thinking Monte will hold back the tide is wishful thinking. I don't think he intends to do that and he couldn't if he wanted to. Tzarevitch [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Has Monte Cook made 4th ed Unnecessary?
Top