Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Nepenthe" data-source="post: 3536753" data-attributes="member: 52256">No. I was under the impression that maneuvers could only be used against &quot;enemies&quot;, and while I've met some offending walls in my day, my emotions have never quite reach enmity. Of course if I'm wrong, I'll just keep house-ruling it that wayBut not exactly plentiful, IIRC. You have a point there, though.Ok... But now I have completely no idea why you said it. I'm assuming this somehow deals with ToB not representing the sword and sorcery genre, but I'm just failing to make the connection here. Fair enough. And I would like to point out that I was in no way assuming you were less knowledgeable, I was just going on what you were saying - some parts of which I still have trouble connecting to the book. I'm really trying to understand your point of view here; You're saying that the ToB is somehow outside the conventional Sword and Sorcery genre that &quot;basic&quot; D&amp;D represents?Cheers,/N</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Nepenthe, post: 3536753, member: 52256"] No. I was under the impression that maneuvers could only be used against "enemies", and while I've met some offending walls in my day, my emotions have never quite reach enmity. Of course if I'm wrong, I'll just keep house-ruling it that way But not exactly plentiful, IIRC. You have a point there, though. Ok... But now I have completely no idea why you said it. I'm assuming this somehow deals with ToB not representing the sword and sorcery genre, but I'm just failing to make the connection here. Fair enough. And I would like to point out that I was in no way assuming you were less knowledgeable, I was just going on what you were saying - some parts of which I still have trouble connecting to the book. I'm really trying to understand your point of view here; You're saying that the ToB is somehow outside the conventional Sword and Sorcery genre that "basic" D&D represents? Cheers, /N [/QUOTE]

Verification