Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Has the wave crested? (Bo9S)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DreadArchon" data-source="post: 3555916" data-attributes="member: 49449"><p>Yeah, that's what I think should be avoided. I'd much rather it be varied*--Fighters and Warlocks who are weaker in a single encounter but who can go full-tilt all week, Wizards and... I don't know, maybe Paladins, who can do the "<a href="http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ExplosiveOverclocking" target="_blank">red-lined table saw</a>" thing but take a while to recharge, Bards and Barbarians, who take a long time to recharge but also a long time to use their abilities, and now Martial Adepts and the like who have fast recharge times but still have to actively recharge. And, of course, a whole mess of stuff in splatbooks that smears these up into each other at the player's option.</p><p></p><p></p><p>It's far easier to enforce metagame balance on in-game events than it is to force in-game events onto metagame balance. Take your "per session" rules, for example. With my group, one session can last anywhere from one to seven hours, and story arc length can vary wildly even accounting for actual play time (e.g. one module can take four hours, which might even be two sessions, whereas another, equally-long module can take fifteen hours... which still might end up being only two sessions, though that's a stretch). Apparently, some groups play for a whole day at a time, or one whole weekend a month, or a certain set time limit, etc.</p><p></p><p>Balancing by totally metagame considerations, such as session length, would thus be functionally impossible. The best you could do would be to have a scaling table dictating how often something can happen based on both session time and story arc length, with (as you mentioned) rules for fast-forwarding if need be. Even then, each module would need an intro page detailing how one should should modify things based on sessions length.</p><p></p><p>On the other hand, "per day" or "per encounter" is an in-game concept that one can metagame fairly easily if need be. As a DM, it's entirely reasonable (in many cases) to simply put your foot down and say "No. You can't rest here. The world is not waiting for you; this session/arc/adventure takes place within a single day/week/etc., unless you retreat completely and start over. No, I don't <em>care</em> if you know Rope Trick, you woke up 40 minutes ago and you're just not tired enough to go back to sleep."</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>*All comparisons from here out are meant to be compared to each other in a hypothetical 4th Edition, not to their current forms.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DreadArchon, post: 3555916, member: 49449"] Yeah, that's what I think should be avoided. I'd much rather it be varied*--Fighters and Warlocks who are weaker in a single encounter but who can go full-tilt all week, Wizards and... I don't know, maybe Paladins, who can do the "[url=http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ExplosiveOverclocking]red-lined table saw[/url]" thing but take a while to recharge, Bards and Barbarians, who take a long time to recharge but also a long time to use their abilities, and now Martial Adepts and the like who have fast recharge times but still have to actively recharge. And, of course, a whole mess of stuff in splatbooks that smears these up into each other at the player's option. It's far easier to enforce metagame balance on in-game events than it is to force in-game events onto metagame balance. Take your "per session" rules, for example. With my group, one session can last anywhere from one to seven hours, and story arc length can vary wildly even accounting for actual play time (e.g. one module can take four hours, which might even be two sessions, whereas another, equally-long module can take fifteen hours... which still might end up being only two sessions, though that's a stretch). Apparently, some groups play for a whole day at a time, or one whole weekend a month, or a certain set time limit, etc. Balancing by totally metagame considerations, such as session length, would thus be functionally impossible. The best you could do would be to have a scaling table dictating how often something can happen based on both session time and story arc length, with (as you mentioned) rules for fast-forwarding if need be. Even then, each module would need an intro page detailing how one should should modify things based on sessions length. On the other hand, "per day" or "per encounter" is an in-game concept that one can metagame fairly easily if need be. As a DM, it's entirely reasonable (in many cases) to simply put your foot down and say "No. You can't rest here. The world is not waiting for you; this session/arc/adventure takes place within a single day/week/etc., unless you retreat completely and start over. No, I don't [i]care[/i] if you know Rope Trick, you woke up 40 minutes ago and you're just not tired enough to go back to sleep." *All comparisons from here out are meant to be compared to each other in a hypothetical 4th Edition, not to their current forms. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Has the wave crested? (Bo9S)
Top