Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Sword of Spirit" data-source="post: 9856570" data-attributes="member: 6677017">I'm highly intolerant of errors of any sort. I'm also very particular about things. If I had AI summarize a session for example, I'd have to spend time reviewing it carefully to make sure there are no errors. And there almost certainly would be. So if have to correct them. And then I wouldn't like the tone, or voice, or emphasis the AI write things with. So I either have to rewrite those parts or be left with a feeling of disatisfaction. So to get results I am satisfied with would probably take about the same amount of time and energy, but instead of spending that time just being creative, that time would be spent error checking. Not my thing.Plus, I'm better at avoiding informational errors when I'm putting something together than when I'm looking over something I didn't, because in the former case I know where the information comes from, while in the latter I have to look up where it comes from. Something as simple as the AI summary on search engines is more useful at giving me links to look stuff up than at summarizing it, because there are usually mistakes in the summary.Now, sometimes those mistakes don't matter because all you need is links to the real sources, or you need a certain type of general info and are adept at knowing what is accurate and isn't because you have relevant skills and knowledge. And that's why I don't just turn off the search assistants entirely. But most people most of the time shouldn't be be using them. To much intentional disinfo in the world to actively court it.For simple PC art I'll use AI, but it's hard to get results I like. For scene background images to set a mood I'll do the same, though in that case I'm just looking for existing stuff, much of which is AI generated. And those personal game uses are pretty much the limit of what I'll accept for creative purposes (unless you count Dungeon Alchemist battlemaps, but that's kind of a stretch to call AI). I want my creative work done by people.I think AI has great potential for things like medical diagnosis. It's already way more accurate than doctors. But thing is, you will have the doctor carefully review everything it tells them. Its purpose is to sit through all the stuff the doctor can't remember and tell them what it looks like is going on, so the doctor can go, "wow, yeah, I never would have thought of that, but it does fit the symptoms better than what I was thinking, and it found that complex symptom from the tests I never noticed". I would actively choose to have my doctors do that if I could. I'm also a fan of using it in science for things like materials design. What these sorts of things have in common is that it is doing legwork for experts that will then review it to see what's in going on that they wouldn't have come up with on their own. That's what it is ideal for.I just see very little in the way of creative or informational summaries from AI that don't sacrifice quality for quantity, and that quality matters way more to me.</blockquote>

Verification