Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="The Firebird" data-source="post: 9874396" data-attributes="member: 7015803">I recognized the first 3 passages, so I could tell. It's a fun experiment and it seems people in general can't. But, this is still relatively short passages. And these two ideas are in tension:"Skeptics have <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-weekend-essay/why-ai-isnt-going-to-make-art" target="_blank">argued</a> that A.I. can never be truly creative, because it lacks the kind of worldly experiences humans have. But several <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-76900-1" target="_blank">recent</a> <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5606570" target="_blank">studies</a> have suggested that, in blind tests, many readers prefer A.I.-generated writing to human-authored works.""We asked A.I. to choose an existing piece of strong writing and then craft its own version using its own voice."If you give a LLM a prompt in a specific style, it will replicate that style well. This has been useful for me, because I can get stuff that is close to my style. But, it doesn't reach the "truly creative" bar, as nebulous as that is, because there isn't yet a high-quality, uniquely AI style.</blockquote>