Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Hasbro Confirms New Unannounced Dungeons & Dragons Video Game in Development
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 9513466" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>You never have to destroy your own IP/brand.</p><p></p><p>It's never mandatory.</p><p></p><p>There's no gun pointed at WotC's head.</p><p></p><p>They absolutely have a choice as to whether they attempt to spin up a BG4 internally or not. Particularly as doing so will take 4-8 years, even if they started already.</p><p></p><p>They absolutely have a choice here.</p><p></p><p>They could do as you say, and destroy the IP for a little short-term profit and a permanent loss of a viable IP and significant blowback on to WotC themselves. Gamers are real haters - you trick them into pre-ordering a bad game, they will hate you basically forever.</p><p></p><p>Or... they could probably pretty easily convince someone like Owlcat to make BG4. You say there are "no studios", but Owlcat 100% would do that. They're not locked in to Pathfinder, they are absolutely happy to make RPGs based on other people's IPs, and they're irrationally well-regarded by CRPG players (despite their consistently mediocre writing, dubious gameplay and horrifically bad minigames). The hype for an Owlcat BG4 (or IWD3) would be extremely high, even without BG3 levels of production values. And they'd probably deliver a game that was at least regarded as solid, and review and sold well.</p><p></p><p>Or they could just hold on to the brand for a few years until an opportunity arose (like, say, Larian's next CRPG was an absolute trashfire, which I don't think we can rule out).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 9513466, member: 18"] You never have to destroy your own IP/brand. It's never mandatory. There's no gun pointed at WotC's head. They absolutely have a choice as to whether they attempt to spin up a BG4 internally or not. Particularly as doing so will take 4-8 years, even if they started already. They absolutely have a choice here. They could do as you say, and destroy the IP for a little short-term profit and a permanent loss of a viable IP and significant blowback on to WotC themselves. Gamers are real haters - you trick them into pre-ordering a bad game, they will hate you basically forever. Or... they could probably pretty easily convince someone like Owlcat to make BG4. You say there are "no studios", but Owlcat 100% would do that. They're not locked in to Pathfinder, they are absolutely happy to make RPGs based on other people's IPs, and they're irrationally well-regarded by CRPG players (despite their consistently mediocre writing, dubious gameplay and horrifically bad minigames). The hype for an Owlcat BG4 (or IWD3) would be extremely high, even without BG3 levels of production values. And they'd probably deliver a game that was at least regarded as solid, and review and sold well. Or they could just hold on to the brand for a few years until an opportunity arose (like, say, Larian's next CRPG was an absolute trashfire, which I don't think we can rule out). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Hasbro Confirms New Unannounced Dungeons & Dragons Video Game in Development
Top