Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Hasbro, Greyhawk, and 4E speculation
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tinner" data-source="post: 2576873" data-attributes="member: 19667"><p>Again, I agree to a point.</p><p>People will buy things that are losing money.</p><p></p><p>However, in what universe does it make sense for Hasbro to spend $65 million to re-acquire the video game rights for a brand that is <strong>allegedly</strong> losing money, and by all reports has a potential sales value of $30 million?</p><p></p><p>Spending that kind of cash on a loser that you want to dump is stupid.</p><p>I don't think Hasbro is a stupid company.</p><p>I think it's more likely they found a new angle to make more profit on D&D video games, and thought a $65 million payout was worth it in the long run.</p><p></p><p>To me that sounds like Hasbro is trying to strengthen the brand, and consolidate its position with video games.</p><p>I see this as a sign that we are going to see more D&D products, esp. video games.</p><p>I'd also lay odds that this renegotiation had something to do with D&D online. If you were to twist my arm, I'd bet it has to do with the fact that those original agreements didn't include any terms re: monthly subscription gaming for any of those titles.</p><p></p><p>I suppose it's possible that Hasbro shelled out that kind of cash, because they have a buyer willing to pay in excess of $65 million for D&D.</p><p>And if that's the case, then I anticipate great things from our new wealthy masters! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tinner, post: 2576873, member: 19667"] Again, I agree to a point. People will buy things that are losing money. However, in what universe does it make sense for Hasbro to spend $65 million to re-acquire the video game rights for a brand that is [B]allegedly[/B] losing money, and by all reports has a potential sales value of $30 million? Spending that kind of cash on a loser that you want to dump is stupid. I don't think Hasbro is a stupid company. I think it's more likely they found a new angle to make more profit on D&D video games, and thought a $65 million payout was worth it in the long run. To me that sounds like Hasbro is trying to strengthen the brand, and consolidate its position with video games. I see this as a sign that we are going to see more D&D products, esp. video games. I'd also lay odds that this renegotiation had something to do with D&D online. If you were to twist my arm, I'd bet it has to do with the fact that those original agreements didn't include any terms re: monthly subscription gaming for any of those titles. I suppose it's possible that Hasbro shelled out that kind of cash, because they have a buyer willing to pay in excess of $65 million for D&D. And if that's the case, then I anticipate great things from our new wealthy masters! :D [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Hasbro, Greyhawk, and 4E speculation
Top