Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Hasbro's CEO Reports OGL-Related D&D Beyond Cancellations Had Minimal Impact
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BlueFin" data-source="post: 8941286" data-attributes="member: 7040011"><p>That's all cool, and I essentially agree with you, but a few points ...</p><p></p><p>You're quoting a post of mine that was a direct response to something said by [USER=6778210]@Justice and Rule[/USER]. They said "<em>It really feels</em> like a lot of people want to avoid the whole "intent" question ...". By extension I was agreeing with "it really feels" and that I have the same "feeling" of things as they do. So if you put "I agree that it really feels ..." at the beginning of my sentence, then I think that adjusts the tone - but I didn't put it there because it was already there in the post I was responding to, and I think my post should be read in that context.</p><p></p><p>Most importantly, I'm not telling anyone what "the truth" is. I am remarking on the fact that a lot of people appear to be willing to let things go and they are expressing it in a way that, to me, comes across as being "inconvenient" to pursue it any longer, because to do so would get in the way of what they want - and that's totally fine. Anyone is entitled to do that. I do it myself at times. But, I have not made an accusation at any particular person, and I think that is important to remember. I am commenting on the general impression I am getting.</p><p></p><p>But that will (hopefully) be clearer if (and I have no expectation) you do read my longer post. You will see I have absolutely acknowledged the idea of the "inconvenient truth" (although I described it differently) as valid. As said, I do it at times myself. In that longer post I have been pretty clear to say "my opinion", "to me" etc, and have acknowledged that other people have different perspectives, and I respect those. What I do also go on to describe is why this particular topic is something that concerns me a lot and why I think wotc is a risk to the hobby. Agree, don't agree, that's up to the reader. I have not told anyone they have to agree, or what "the truth" is.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BlueFin, post: 8941286, member: 7040011"] That's all cool, and I essentially agree with you, but a few points ... You're quoting a post of mine that was a direct response to something said by [USER=6778210]@Justice and Rule[/USER]. They said "[I]It really feels[/I] like a lot of people want to avoid the whole "intent" question ...". By extension I was agreeing with "it really feels" and that I have the same "feeling" of things as they do. So if you put "I agree that it really feels ..." at the beginning of my sentence, then I think that adjusts the tone - but I didn't put it there because it was already there in the post I was responding to, and I think my post should be read in that context. Most importantly, I'm not telling anyone what "the truth" is. I am remarking on the fact that a lot of people appear to be willing to let things go and they are expressing it in a way that, to me, comes across as being "inconvenient" to pursue it any longer, because to do so would get in the way of what they want - and that's totally fine. Anyone is entitled to do that. I do it myself at times. But, I have not made an accusation at any particular person, and I think that is important to remember. I am commenting on the general impression I am getting. But that will (hopefully) be clearer if (and I have no expectation) you do read my longer post. You will see I have absolutely acknowledged the idea of the "inconvenient truth" (although I described it differently) as valid. As said, I do it at times myself. In that longer post I have been pretty clear to say "my opinion", "to me" etc, and have acknowledged that other people have different perspectives, and I respect those. What I do also go on to describe is why this particular topic is something that concerns me a lot and why I think wotc is a risk to the hobby. Agree, don't agree, that's up to the reader. I have not told anyone they have to agree, or what "the truth" is. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Hasbro's CEO Reports OGL-Related D&D Beyond Cancellations Had Minimal Impact
Top