Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Man in the Funny Hat" data-source="post: 4720353" data-attributes="member: 32740">If I intend for the home game to be fairly reported and credited I must accept RPGA limitations, however benevolent they may be.  Yes?  If I don't want or need the RPGA sanction because neither I nor my players want or need to port characters to conventions or other games VIA RPGA sanction, then I hardly need the RPGA for that either.  If I don't need the RPGA as a source of adventures because I can come up with plenty of my own as well as draw from other sources then I don't need the RPGA for that.  If I play for years at a time with the same players in the same campaign then I don't need the RPGA to find a game or players for a game. I'm starting to get a vibe that it's just not acceptible that I NOT accept the RPGA as being the next sliced bread.  I wonder if the ghost of Jimmy Hoffa will someday appear flanked by a vampiric longshoreman and an ogre teamster and tell me I HAVE to be a member before I can participate anymore. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />  Again, I understand that other people love the RPGA and get great benefits from it, but is it really so politically incorrect to simply not care for the RPGA and not need it?</blockquote>