Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Have gamers ever been tolerant?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Sigil" data-source="post: 349249" data-attributes="member: 2013"><p>Well, since my quote seems to have started this little tiff, I'll define my terms (sort of).</p><p></p><p>When I think "ham" I immediately think of Adam Sandler, Jim Carey (including the Truman Show to some degree), and Mike Meyers. These guys are very good at one genre - comedy - and to me they seem to be hams - in that their performance seems to be, as indicated, limited to comedic, outlandish, exaggerated spoof stuff.</p><p></p><p>This does not mean they CAN'T do serious acting (see: Robin Williams, who has done a lot of serious stuff of late but was probably considered a ham early in his career), but simply that they DON'T do it.</p><p></p><p>Note also that I did not say "all serious actors despise hams" - I said there are (some) serious actors who despise hams. By serious actor, I suppose I should have said something a little more inflammatory, such as, "someone who is vain about the acting profession and thinks of it as a highly evolved art form and despises the fact that some people seem to want to take it and do lowbrow comedy to amuse the masses." In other words, people who think acting should always/only include serious characters and that comedy never has a place.</p><p></p><p>Whether or not a ham is selfish and hogs the spotlight is not the point - plenty of "serious actors" are selfish to the point that they are prima donnas and can't stand anyone else getting attention either. Do they come on stage and crack a joke to steal the other guy's thunder? No. Instead, they put in a well-placed complaint/veiled threat or two and get the other person in the spotlight fired. Which is worse? IMO, both are equally bad in different ways.</p><p></p><p>Before you go looking down your nose at my statement simply because it relies on some slight generalizations, please step back for a moment and see if it contains a grain of truth. The reaction the statement has gotten does nothing but prove my point - that some people despise hams even though a lot of people love them because they want comedy - even lowbrow, pandering comedy.</p><p></p><p>Now, I'm not saying these guys are like this in real life. For all I know, they are serious, dedicated actors - as serious as anyone - in fact, I kind of suspect they are - but their persona is hammy and goof-off.</p><p></p><p>BTW, for the record, 99 days out of 100, I despise Adam Sandler, Jim Carey, and Mike Meyers movies - I have no need for the immature, lowbrow humor. 100 days out of 100 I despise Carrot Top. But does that mean that I have the right to say they're doing things the wrong way and are not doing things correctly? Especially on that 1 day out 100 that I actually want to watch an Adam Sandler movie? By the amount of money they rake in, I would say not - obviously a lot of people have different opinions.</p><p></p><p>And that is what it comes down to - it's a difference in opinion. 99 days out of 100 I want to play a "role-playing" campaign with a depth of roles and stretching my imaginative limits. But there are days when I just want to pull out my +12 Hackmaster and start mowing down anything that moves indiscriminately.</p><p></p><p>Ultimately, we need varied experience - we need to laugh at "hammy" and cry at "serious" potrayals. We need to stretch ourselves and roleplay something that is completely out of our normal experience (perhaps a CE mind flayer priestess of hellspawn) as well as something that is a magnification of what we hope are our best qualities (that LG paladin that is always on the verge of putting Good too far ahead of Lawful). And sometimes, we just need to bust out our +12 Hackmaster sword and a can of Whoop-Arse. It's dangerous to call someone a munchkin just because he's doing the latter - who's to say he can't do the former?</p><p></p><p>To paraphrase a famous LotR line - Many that live deserve death... and some that die deserve life. Can YOU give it to them? No.</p><p></p><p>Many that "munch" need a dose of "how to role-play"... and some that "role-play" need a dose of "munch." Can YOU give it to them? Yes. Then do it and do both of you a favor - let yourself loose and go munch once in a while - and educate them in the finer arts of "role-playing" - then you can BOTH be comfortable in each other's world.</p><p></p><p>--The Sigil</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Sigil, post: 349249, member: 2013"] Well, since my quote seems to have started this little tiff, I'll define my terms (sort of). When I think "ham" I immediately think of Adam Sandler, Jim Carey (including the Truman Show to some degree), and Mike Meyers. These guys are very good at one genre - comedy - and to me they seem to be hams - in that their performance seems to be, as indicated, limited to comedic, outlandish, exaggerated spoof stuff. This does not mean they CAN'T do serious acting (see: Robin Williams, who has done a lot of serious stuff of late but was probably considered a ham early in his career), but simply that they DON'T do it. Note also that I did not say "all serious actors despise hams" - I said there are (some) serious actors who despise hams. By serious actor, I suppose I should have said something a little more inflammatory, such as, "someone who is vain about the acting profession and thinks of it as a highly evolved art form and despises the fact that some people seem to want to take it and do lowbrow comedy to amuse the masses." In other words, people who think acting should always/only include serious characters and that comedy never has a place. Whether or not a ham is selfish and hogs the spotlight is not the point - plenty of "serious actors" are selfish to the point that they are prima donnas and can't stand anyone else getting attention either. Do they come on stage and crack a joke to steal the other guy's thunder? No. Instead, they put in a well-placed complaint/veiled threat or two and get the other person in the spotlight fired. Which is worse? IMO, both are equally bad in different ways. Before you go looking down your nose at my statement simply because it relies on some slight generalizations, please step back for a moment and see if it contains a grain of truth. The reaction the statement has gotten does nothing but prove my point - that some people despise hams even though a lot of people love them because they want comedy - even lowbrow, pandering comedy. Now, I'm not saying these guys are like this in real life. For all I know, they are serious, dedicated actors - as serious as anyone - in fact, I kind of suspect they are - but their persona is hammy and goof-off. BTW, for the record, 99 days out of 100, I despise Adam Sandler, Jim Carey, and Mike Meyers movies - I have no need for the immature, lowbrow humor. 100 days out of 100 I despise Carrot Top. But does that mean that I have the right to say they're doing things the wrong way and are not doing things correctly? Especially on that 1 day out 100 that I actually want to watch an Adam Sandler movie? By the amount of money they rake in, I would say not - obviously a lot of people have different opinions. And that is what it comes down to - it's a difference in opinion. 99 days out of 100 I want to play a "role-playing" campaign with a depth of roles and stretching my imaginative limits. But there are days when I just want to pull out my +12 Hackmaster and start mowing down anything that moves indiscriminately. Ultimately, we need varied experience - we need to laugh at "hammy" and cry at "serious" potrayals. We need to stretch ourselves and roleplay something that is completely out of our normal experience (perhaps a CE mind flayer priestess of hellspawn) as well as something that is a magnification of what we hope are our best qualities (that LG paladin that is always on the verge of putting Good too far ahead of Lawful). And sometimes, we just need to bust out our +12 Hackmaster sword and a can of Whoop-Arse. It's dangerous to call someone a munchkin just because he's doing the latter - who's to say he can't do the former? To paraphrase a famous LotR line - Many that live deserve death... and some that die deserve life. Can YOU give it to them? No. Many that "munch" need a dose of "how to role-play"... and some that "role-play" need a dose of "munch." Can YOU give it to them? Yes. Then do it and do both of you a favor - let yourself loose and go munch once in a while - and educate them in the finer arts of "role-playing" - then you can BOTH be comfortable in each other's world. --The Sigil [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Have gamers ever been tolerant?
Top