Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Vigilance" data-source="post: 1729300" data-attributes="member: 4275">I knew that, but it did seem to be a humorous thing to say <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />And as I have said, if RPGObjects were the license holder of a property like Thieves' World, Conan or Dragonlance I would be on the phone with my boss every DAY demanding not only that the company produce modules in support of those properties but also that I be allowed to write them.But I don't work for a company that owns a license like that.Which makes modules a dicey proposition for us. It doesn't mean we hate adventures or have this myopic view of the industry. We actually do modules whenever we think we can make a sufficient return on the investment and do as much free adventure support as we can manage.Chuck</blockquote>