Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Jfdlsjfd" data-source="post: 9737642" data-attributes="member: 42856">Sure, but to take your analogy to its end, people might not want to say &quot;I am allergic to peanuts&quot; unless they need to. Well, they might even be less comfortable with saying &quot;I have a phobia&quot; than saying &quot;I am allergic to peanuts&quot; to complete strangers (which I guess is the more common use case of these tools). Making them reserved for extreme use case will probably make people who would benefit from using it early to use it too late, after pondering if they can stand the scene or not. Especially if there is a threat to be booted if you abuse it.Expanding the use case will certainly reduce the stigma of using it. If you have a tool that is telegraphing &quot;this scene is too emotionally loaded for me&quot; when you excuse yourself from the able, I think it's best for the accessibility of the tools if it's the same tool used for &quot;I'll be back, I need to go to the bathroom&quot;.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Jfdlsjfd, post: 9737642, member: 42856"] Sure, but to take your analogy to its end, people might not want to say "I am allergic to peanuts" unless they need to. Well, they might even be less comfortable with saying "I have a phobia" than saying "I am allergic to peanuts" to complete strangers (which I guess is the more common use case of these tools). Making them reserved for extreme use case will probably make people who would benefit from using it early to use it too late, after pondering if they can stand the scene or not. Especially if there is a threat to be booted if you abuse it. Expanding the use case will certainly reduce the stigma of using it. If you have a tool that is telegraphing "this scene is too emotionally loaded for me" when you excuse yourself from the able, I think it's best for the accessibility of the tools if it's the same tool used for "I'll be back, I need to go to the bathroom". [/QUOTE]

Verification