Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Swarmkeeper" data-source="post: 9006055" data-attributes="member: 6921763">Ah, yes, the inevitable uncharitable reading of what I wrote. You did read the part about the player being overly greedy to the detriment of others?&nbsp; Perhaps I wasn't clear enough and needed some more disclaimers?&nbsp; Like, if the person did not relent when the issue was addressed then they might not be a good fit for the table?&nbsp; Or that most groups would actually talk it through and if the person didn't actually mean to be overly greedy someone could point out their mistake and they could let someone else have some of those high numbers they were inadvertently monopolizing?&nbsp; Etc.Well, good thing I didn't say that either you're a &quot;good&quot; player or a &quot;jerk&quot;.Yet you imply that the stat draft is &quot;pitting players against each other&quot; despite the explanations of others describing how it is not.&nbsp; Sounds, ironically, like a pretty black and white label to me...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Swarmkeeper, post: 9006055, member: 6921763"] Ah, yes, the inevitable uncharitable reading of what I wrote. You did read the part about the player being overly greedy to the detriment of others? Perhaps I wasn't clear enough and needed some more disclaimers? Like, if the person did not relent when the issue was addressed then they might not be a good fit for the table? Or that most groups would actually talk it through and if the person didn't actually mean to be overly greedy someone could point out their mistake and they could let someone else have some of those high numbers they were inadvertently monopolizing? Etc. Well, good thing I didn't say that [I]either[/I] [I]you're a "good" player or a "jerk"[/I]. Yet [I]you [/I]imply that the stat draft is "pitting players against each other" despite the explanations of others describing how it is not. Sounds, ironically, like a pretty black and white label to me... [/QUOTE]

Verification