Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Healing reserve feat?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nyeshet" data-source="post: 3158065" data-attributes="member: 18363"><p>That might work. It is somewhat similar to the Warlock special 'Fiendish Resilience'. </p><p></p><p>Personally, I think the nonlethal damage is an interesting alternative. </p><p></p><p>Had I come up with the idea, I likely would have used something akin to: </p><p></p><p>Benefit: The cleric can at will as a standard action heal a number of hit points equal to up to the level of the prepared spell, but in exchange the cleric takes nonlethal damage equal to the points healed. This non-lethal damage must heal naturally. It cannot be healed magically except by a Miracle or other form of direct intercession from their patron deity. </p><p></p><p>The fact that this nonlethal damage cannot be healed magically acts as a limit to what otherwise could be an overly potent at will ability. </p><p></p><p>Actually, if I used the above I would likely go a step further: the ability to heal ability damage on a one for one basis (ie: the cleric takes on the damage, but it must heal naturally). Perhaps two points of ability damage to the cleric to heal one point of ability drain might also work? Or perhaps that is a bit <em>too</em> powerful? Hmm, or perhaps the feat would require the preparing or ability to cast one of the 'Restoration' spells, somehow limiting its ability to heal based on the type of restoration cast?</p><p></p><p>I much rather prefer limitations that are loose enough that the player doesn't necessarily feel them as such (The cleric could choose to heal hp equal to their total hp and fall unconscious if the player so willed it.) while at the same time are strict enough to prevent overuse of potentially overly potent abilities (The player will almost never choose to do so, however, as this would a) remove the cleric from play for the day, and b) could leave the cleric vulnerable to potentially lethal dangers, dependent on the situation.).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nyeshet, post: 3158065, member: 18363"] That might work. It is somewhat similar to the Warlock special 'Fiendish Resilience'. Personally, I think the nonlethal damage is an interesting alternative. Had I come up with the idea, I likely would have used something akin to: Benefit: The cleric can at will as a standard action heal a number of hit points equal to up to the level of the prepared spell, but in exchange the cleric takes nonlethal damage equal to the points healed. This non-lethal damage must heal naturally. It cannot be healed magically except by a Miracle or other form of direct intercession from their patron deity. The fact that this nonlethal damage cannot be healed magically acts as a limit to what otherwise could be an overly potent at will ability. Actually, if I used the above I would likely go a step further: the ability to heal ability damage on a one for one basis (ie: the cleric takes on the damage, but it must heal naturally). Perhaps two points of ability damage to the cleric to heal one point of ability drain might also work? Or perhaps that is a bit [i]too[/i] powerful? Hmm, or perhaps the feat would require the preparing or ability to cast one of the 'Restoration' spells, somehow limiting its ability to heal based on the type of restoration cast? I much rather prefer limitations that are loose enough that the player doesn't necessarily feel them as such (The cleric could choose to heal hp equal to their total hp and fall unconscious if the player so willed it.) while at the same time are strict enough to prevent overuse of potentially overly potent abilities (The player will almost never choose to do so, however, as this would a) remove the cleric from play for the day, and b) could leave the cleric vulnerable to potentially lethal dangers, dependent on the situation.). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Healing reserve feat?
Top