Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Healing spells and use activated items= 1d8 per round?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Petrosian" data-source="post: 445672" data-attributes="member: 1149"><p>[/B]</p></blockquote><p></p><p></p><p>As you hopefully will see soon, the apparent contradict stems only from what you "infer". After you put words in my mouth, then there is a contradiction, not before.</p><p></p><p>I did not say that. Not at all. You add that in and a contradiction exists.</p><p></p><p>If it is not in the book. if it is not given permission to be made in the book. then its not a wotc official item.</p><p></p><p>wotc is responsible for their items, not yours.</p><p></p><p>wotc did not miss a use activated clw, they didn't include it. If YOU decide now that you want to add it to your campaign, AS I HAVE SAID BEFORE and anyone who took the few second to read my post would see, no one will come in and stop you.</p><p></p><p>You, and you alone, bear that responsibility.</p><p></p><p>it is that simple.</p><p></p><p>My reasoning is that wotc is responsible for only the items they create.</p><p></p><p>if you decide for your game to add a new item not covered by their rules and sample items, its your baby.</p><p></p><p>Ahhh... finally you get it. Thats what all those "you can make it" statements were at least for some a CLUE to.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Huh? </p><p></p><p>you can make for your game anything, any item.</p><p></p><p>Let me repeat that for those who choose to ignore it...</p><p></p><p>you can make any item for your game.</p><p></p><p>Ok since you seem to keep missing it ONE MORE TIME...</p><p></p><p>you can make any item for your game.</p><p></p><p>Any inference you choose to add into my statements that contradicts that is just you being intentionally difficult.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Huh? Whatever?</p><p></p><p>They said no to making it an official item.</p><p></p><p>since you still do not get it...</p><p></p><p>no one ever said you cannot do what you want in your game.</p><p></p><p>if you choose to make a codpiece of wonder, fine. Add it to your game. As Gm anything is possible.</p><p></p><p>the responsibility falls on you to make that a reasonable thing.</p><p></p><p>this is totally seperate from did wotc decide to have the item be official.</p><p></p><p>wotc playtesters did not miss "the item you created for you home grown game"</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I doubt it, but we should be done. you can, i am certain, continue to ignore portions of my post and add in your inferences as if they were comments and prolong this fiasco much longer, but then, there aint much that can be done about that, now is there. </p><p></p><p>After you add in your own inferences, after you ignore the points, sure, i can see why.</p><p></p><p>After adding your inferences, sure.</p><p></p><p></p><p>you seem to be being deliberately obtuse and selective... maybe thats civil in your games.</p><p></p><p>but if you feel better playing the poor victim, works for me.</p><p>[/QUOTE]</p>
[QUOTE="Petrosian, post: 445672, member: 1149"] [/B][/QUOTE] As you hopefully will see soon, the apparent contradict stems only from what you "infer". After you put words in my mouth, then there is a contradiction, not before. I did not say that. Not at all. You add that in and a contradiction exists. If it is not in the book. if it is not given permission to be made in the book. then its not a wotc official item. wotc is responsible for their items, not yours. wotc did not miss a use activated clw, they didn't include it. If YOU decide now that you want to add it to your campaign, AS I HAVE SAID BEFORE and anyone who took the few second to read my post would see, no one will come in and stop you. You, and you alone, bear that responsibility. it is that simple. My reasoning is that wotc is responsible for only the items they create. if you decide for your game to add a new item not covered by their rules and sample items, its your baby. Ahhh... finally you get it. Thats what all those "you can make it" statements were at least for some a CLUE to. Huh? you can make for your game anything, any item. Let me repeat that for those who choose to ignore it... you can make any item for your game. Ok since you seem to keep missing it ONE MORE TIME... you can make any item for your game. Any inference you choose to add into my statements that contradicts that is just you being intentionally difficult. Huh? Whatever? They said no to making it an official item. since you still do not get it... no one ever said you cannot do what you want in your game. if you choose to make a codpiece of wonder, fine. Add it to your game. As Gm anything is possible. the responsibility falls on you to make that a reasonable thing. this is totally seperate from did wotc decide to have the item be official. wotc playtesters did not miss "the item you created for you home grown game" I doubt it, but we should be done. you can, i am certain, continue to ignore portions of my post and add in your inferences as if they were comments and prolong this fiasco much longer, but then, there aint much that can be done about that, now is there. After you add in your own inferences, after you ignore the points, sure, i can see why. After adding your inferences, sure. you seem to be being deliberately obtuse and selective... maybe thats civil in your games. but if you feel better playing the poor victim, works for me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Healing spells and use activated items= 1d8 per round?
Top