Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Healing Word
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 5027279" data-attributes="member: 82106"><p>Yeah, you're not even close to the bottom of that well yet. I direct you to the druid using Wild Shape and in his beast form. Note the way the Wild Shape power SPECIFICALLY says you can sustain other powers while Wild Shaped even if they lack the beast form keyword. According to CS this is so because EVEN SUSTAINING A POWER IS USING IT. As a consequence if a druid casts a summons and then uses Wild Shape he has apparently no way to command his summons because to do so would be a forbidden use of the power (assuming it lacks the beast form keyword, which is true of all extant summons powers).</p><p></p><p>This CS ruling also has the consequence that a caster taking ANY action which relates to an ongoing ranged or area power provokes an OA. This includes sustaining any such power, making some type of attack, commanding a summons, etc. In fact the consequences are quite broad. </p><p></p><p>Beyond that there are some rather absurd consequences we can dismiss out of hand, but they still exist. For example if sustain counts as use the wording of the rule restricting you to using a daily once a day kicks in and sustain is illegal by RAW.</p><p></p><p>Now, I obviously think CS is full of it, but that doesn't entirely settle the argument. For example druid summons have instinctive actions. Why do they have these? Probably because in beast form the druid can't command them. Thus we see that in some contexts "use" NEEDS to include secondary ongoing usage of the effects of a power. Yet sustain clearly needs to be excluded from the definition of using a power, at least in the general case.</p><p></p><p>In other words RAW is fairly worthless, CS can't be interpreted literally either and you simply MUST go with RAI in terms of what constitutes use of a power and its related consequences. The rules simply aren't implementable by strict RAW construction.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AbdulAlhazred, post: 5027279, member: 82106"] Yeah, you're not even close to the bottom of that well yet. I direct you to the druid using Wild Shape and in his beast form. Note the way the Wild Shape power SPECIFICALLY says you can sustain other powers while Wild Shaped even if they lack the beast form keyword. According to CS this is so because EVEN SUSTAINING A POWER IS USING IT. As a consequence if a druid casts a summons and then uses Wild Shape he has apparently no way to command his summons because to do so would be a forbidden use of the power (assuming it lacks the beast form keyword, which is true of all extant summons powers). This CS ruling also has the consequence that a caster taking ANY action which relates to an ongoing ranged or area power provokes an OA. This includes sustaining any such power, making some type of attack, commanding a summons, etc. In fact the consequences are quite broad. Beyond that there are some rather absurd consequences we can dismiss out of hand, but they still exist. For example if sustain counts as use the wording of the rule restricting you to using a daily once a day kicks in and sustain is illegal by RAW. Now, I obviously think CS is full of it, but that doesn't entirely settle the argument. For example druid summons have instinctive actions. Why do they have these? Probably because in beast form the druid can't command them. Thus we see that in some contexts "use" NEEDS to include secondary ongoing usage of the effects of a power. Yet sustain clearly needs to be excluded from the definition of using a power, at least in the general case. In other words RAW is fairly worthless, CS can't be interpreted literally either and you simply MUST go with RAI in terms of what constitutes use of a power and its related consequences. The rules simply aren't implementable by strict RAW construction. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Healing Word
Top