Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Patlin" data-source="post: 3462688" data-attributes="member: 17264">&quot;I am a construct.&nbsp; Are you saying that different standards of behavior apply when dealing with constructs and your people? What would those differences be, exactly?&nbsp; Or perhaps more to the point, we should adress your concern about the blindfold and/or possible danger or combat that may await us.&nbsp; The blindfold is to protect the ladies honor and need for privacy in certain matters personal and of trade.&nbsp; It can be easilly removed should we suspect danger.&nbsp; While I suppose it is possible that danger could arise so quickly as to render the blindfold a hinderance, I do not recall anyone promising us that this mission would be easy.&nbsp; I had been under the impression that Dwarves were somewhat sturdy, for creatures of flesh.&nbsp; If, however, you do not feel prepared to face danger on behalf of the children we seek to rescue, I am certain they would not hold it against you.&nbsp; After all, what call of duty can any of them lay at your feet?&nbsp; I, however, wish to pursue this matter to a succesfull conclusion.&nbsp; While an unfortunate number of secrets are involved, I believe that this is our best lead currently.&nbsp; Do not Dwarves have an understanding of the need for secrecy and operational security? Is not House Kundarak, the foremost authority on security, Dwarvish? I do not fully understand your objections, but I do believe your skills would be usefull if you are willing to continue assisting in this quest.&quot;Anvuss thinks for a moment, and then adds:&quot;Also, I would suggest to you that if you accompany us you may be in for an opportunity to observe one of the more fascinating examples of our art in existence.&nbsp; I myself would be loathe to stay behind for that reason alone.&quot;</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Patlin, post: 3462688, member: 17264"] "I am a construct. Are you saying that different standards of behavior apply when dealing with constructs and your people? What would those differences be, exactly? Or perhaps more to the point, we should adress your concern about the blindfold and/or possible danger or combat that may await us. The blindfold is to protect the ladies honor and need for privacy in certain matters personal and of trade. It can be easilly removed should we suspect danger. While I suppose it is possible that danger could arise so quickly as to render the blindfold a hinderance, I do not recall anyone promising us that this mission would be easy. I had been under the impression that Dwarves were somewhat sturdy, for creatures of flesh. If, however, you do not feel prepared to face danger on behalf of the children we seek to rescue, I am certain they would not hold it against you. After all, what call of duty can any of them lay at your feet? I, however, wish to pursue this matter to a succesfull conclusion. While an unfortunate number of secrets are involved, I believe that this is our best lead currently. Do not Dwarves have an understanding of the need for secrecy and operational security? Is not House Kundarak, the foremost authority on security, Dwarvish? I do not fully understand your objections, but I do believe your skills would be usefull if you are willing to continue assisting in this quest." Anvuss thinks for a moment, and then adds: "Also, I would suggest to you that if you accompany us you may be in for an opportunity to observe one of the more fascinating examples of our art in existence. I myself would be loathe to stay behind for that reason alone." [/QUOTE]

Verification