Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Felon" data-source="post: 4686365" data-attributes="member: 8158">Y'know, when this post was first made yesterday, I had the opportunity to be the first to reply. I started out by pointing out how most of mr. pink's criticisms had little to do with what an Oscar is awarded for. But then I thought, "what's the point?" The whole presentation is not well-structured. But I gotta say, mr. pink's James Bond analogy actually does a good job of working against his position. As mouseferatu touches on, the debate of whether Roger Moore or Sean Connery was the best Bond is a staple amongst Bond fans. Moore was smooth and suave, whereas Connery was more of a rough man's man who hid behind a ruse of poshness. Very different interpretations of Ian Flemming's creation.I suspect the Nicholson/Ledger debate will go down as a classic as well, along with whoever takes up the mantle next.</blockquote>