Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Heavy Armor Step Function
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 4721924" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>No, you are correct here.</p><p></p><p>For me, the only problem with the AV armors are Weavemail and Nagascale (IMO). Compared to the other armors, those armors gain something which is not necessary. They give up nothing in order to gain the +1 to Will and +1 to Fort respectively (+1 Will is half of a Paragon feat for free).</p><p></p><p>There are other AV armors that lose 1 AC in order to gain 2 Will or 2 Fort or to Resist, but I am not bothered by that since Will and Fort attacks are so much less frequent and resist stops only a fraction of damage. Something more frequent is lost to gain something more of something less frequent. To me, that is balanced. Weavemail and Nagascale are "bigger, badder, better". Extra gain for the sake of extra gain with no real regard to balance.</p><p></p><p>The advantage of the PHB II table (over the AV table) is that it presents all of the armors without the distraction for a DM of whether other benefits of the armor are balanced or not (if one ignores the * for Weavemail and Nagascale).</p><p></p><p>From the PHB II table, I can see at a glance that as a DM, I want to ignore the Weavemail and Nagascale extra bonuses and the rest of the table is totally ok. That's extremely easy to see.</p><p></p><p>It's much harder to see that in the AV tables without sitting and analyzing the armors one at a time. I must admit, I did not look carefully at the AV tables previously, but I now see that they are more or less identical to PHB II.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It's not illusory for the PHB heavy armor tables.</p><p></p><p>Dropping 1 or 2 on the chart above is no big deal. Nobody would be talking about that. Dropping 5 is a big deal. That's not scaling.</p><p></p><p>And that's precisely why WotC fixed it in AV and in PHB II. Until one sits and analyzes it, it's easy to just use the PHB numbers and have a TPK at mid-Paragon levels because of it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 4721924, member: 2011"] No, you are correct here. For me, the only problem with the AV armors are Weavemail and Nagascale (IMO). Compared to the other armors, those armors gain something which is not necessary. They give up nothing in order to gain the +1 to Will and +1 to Fort respectively (+1 Will is half of a Paragon feat for free). There are other AV armors that lose 1 AC in order to gain 2 Will or 2 Fort or to Resist, but I am not bothered by that since Will and Fort attacks are so much less frequent and resist stops only a fraction of damage. Something more frequent is lost to gain something more of something less frequent. To me, that is balanced. Weavemail and Nagascale are "bigger, badder, better". Extra gain for the sake of extra gain with no real regard to balance. The advantage of the PHB II table (over the AV table) is that it presents all of the armors without the distraction for a DM of whether other benefits of the armor are balanced or not (if one ignores the * for Weavemail and Nagascale). From the PHB II table, I can see at a glance that as a DM, I want to ignore the Weavemail and Nagascale extra bonuses and the rest of the table is totally ok. That's extremely easy to see. It's much harder to see that in the AV tables without sitting and analyzing the armors one at a time. I must admit, I did not look carefully at the AV tables previously, but I now see that they are more or less identical to PHB II. It's not illusory for the PHB heavy armor tables. Dropping 1 or 2 on the chart above is no big deal. Nobody would be talking about that. Dropping 5 is a big deal. That's not scaling. And that's precisely why WotC fixed it in AV and in PHB II. Until one sits and analyzes it, it's easy to just use the PHB numbers and have a TPK at mid-Paragon levels because of it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Heavy Armor Step Function
Top